Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If the ticket has been incorrectly issued, or there is a factual or procedural error even if you committed the offence, then an appeal will generally be successful. If there isn't such an error, and you parked where you shouldn't, then it generally isn't.


Give the information you've shared I'm not sure how much more help you're looking for.


Has it been correctly issued?

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there any way of getting out of this? no crits

> please



We recently got a ticket in Islington. They have different "no return" timings when the footballs on. We argued (successfully) that we didn't know the football was on.


Worth pursuing if you have a reasonable argument.


Ron70

Yes, I've successful appealed all parking tickets I've been given. Because they were wrongly issued.


But then I always try and make sure I don't break the rules...I might make a mistake one day, in which case I would just pay up and move on...

yes, I did. It was one of those ones where there's no signage at all on the street where you think you've legally parked (single yellow on a Sunday - this was in Birmingham), but the council claim you are in a restricted parking zone. We went back and walked a good few streets out and couldn't find any signage to indicate we were in any such zone, which is what I said in my appeal. Never heard from them again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...