Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm just sitting doing some work, taking a sip on my carton of very sweet ribena...that has 34% of the RDA for adults, that is also produced by GlaxoSmithKline group of companies, who also produce antidepressants... my research involvements show that diabetes and high sugar intake can be linked to depression (ie lifestyle choices to eat high sugary food, perhaps in an attempt to feel better)....see where I'm going with this.


Obvious point I guess, but to see the full cycle of a medicated society right before my eyes (and catching myself taking part in it!) is, er, depressing.... now where are those pills?


Is this the meaning of modern life, to act as money siphons for big conglomerates -- buy their stuff, get ill, buy their stuff to enforce wellness....mmmmmm

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/
Share on other sites

Without wanting to reguirgitate Paris '68 situationists - but how DO you mend a sick society ?


In herd immunity terms - treat the infected as best as possible - expect a partial recovery only. Let the infection fade away as the generations mature. Give the new, uninfected, generations a suitable vaccination, aim for minimum take up of 90% but aim for 100%.


In terms of today's "sick society" (a lousy and cliched term BTW) the treatment and vaccinations are hard to develop and harder still to implement. Suggest that the discarded mantra of "Education, Education, Education" is the best place to start but really mean it and fund it this time - and don't constrain it with meaningless ideology or bureaucracy.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180568
Share on other sites

A damn good question and it reminds me of the question that bugs me


Diabetes - Are we ingesting something that has increased the rate of Juvenile Diabetes they leading to drugs companies making tonnes of money from producing Insulin, Needles, pens (Syringes) , blood monitoring equipment (I feel a conspiracy theory coming on), high blood pressure tablets, and so on


OR is there in fact a cure for Diabetes that some drugs company knows about but isn't telling because a cure will make less profit then the continuing treatment of the condition ?


I guess the same goes for Heart Conditions, Cancer and other medical conditions that we should have answers to but don't.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180569
Share on other sites

My son was taught about aspartame (artificial sweetner) in his science class, I think it is a good idea for children to be educated about things concerning there health especially when they have been passed by authorities, I think it teaches them that at the heart of the healing is money.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180573
Share on other sites

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Suggest that the discarded mantra of "Education,

> Education, Education" is the best place to start

> but really mean it and fund it this time - and

> don't constrain it with meaningless ideology or

> bureaucracy.


Hallelujah, and relearn the fact the education isn?t all about the subject matter but about teaching the child to be a strong, questioning and robust individual. If they have that they can easily figure the rest out.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180614
Share on other sites

Buddhist Mantra (And I reckon the Buddhist's are pretty healthy)


Body like a mountain, heart like the ocean, mind like the sky


So...learn to be robust, to let emotions ebb and flow without constraint (don't have to act on them), keep mind clear and free from bias.... easy peasy huh??

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180648
Share on other sites

Xena: Worried prince Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A damn good question and it reminds me of the

> question that bugs me

>

> Diabetes - Are we ingesting something that has

> increased the rate of Juvenile Diabetes they

> leading to drugs companies making tonnes of money

> from producing Insulin, Needles, pens (Syringes) ,

> blood monitoring equipment (I feel a conspiracy

> theory coming on), high blood pressure tablets,

> and so on

>

> OR is there in fact a cure for Diabetes that some

> drugs company knows about but isn't telling

> because a cure will make less profit then the

> continuing treatment of the condition ?

>

> I guess the same goes for Heart Conditions, Cancer

> and other medical conditions that we should have

> answers to but don't.



As far as I'm aware there isn't a secret cure for diabetes. If there was, a pharmaceutical company would patent the 'cure' which would probably produce unimaginable wealth for said company. Unfortunately our children are consuming unprecedented amounts of sugar in their diet now which has led to a worryingly high level of Type 2 diabetes which used to only affect people in middle or old age, ( with the exception of pregnancy induced diabetes ) at a much earler age. Juvenile onset diabetes has always existed and I would add that those affected have not ' brought it on themselves ' with poor diet, it has been a form of diabetes that has always existed and almost certainly always will. A cure for this would be one of the greatest medical break-throughs ever seen. I wish it could be so.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5622-cynicism/#findComment-180973
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...