Jump to content

Recommended Posts

80% of families have received a primary school place of their 1st preference. 2,823 families

15.4% of familes given a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th reference. 553 families

4.5% of families not given a school they showed any interest in. 160 disappointed families.

record year for application - thankfully we have several new recently opened or about to open free school - Judith Keer, Harris East Dulwich and Belham to ensure we have sufficient local places.

More stats attached. I anticiapte have a postcode breakdown early next week to see how we did in SE22.


I hope you have been allocated the school palce you wanted.


If you didn't the concil hotline is open until 9pm tonight. Q&A sheet is attached.


If you want face to face advice the Admissions team have drop in sesssion Cambridge house 20-24 April - please see attached.

You can also ask a local councillor to help. This forum also has great intel from other parents.

Any observatinos of how the system could have gone better please tell me.

Dear James,


I'm glad you are happy with the statistcs. Unfortunately, my family falls on the 4.5% of families not given any of the 6 choices selected. I was offered a place in a school 1.5 miles away from my address. We do not have a car, which means we will have to get two buses to get to the school or face a quite long walk. I'm really looking forward to this experience.


Kind regards,

Helga

Hi Helga,

I'm not happy with the stats but wanted to report them nuetrally rather than make hay from people's suffering.

I've done everything I can to ensure we have sufficient primary school places - initating and leading new free school campaigns and giving a great deal of support to all other local free school campaigns.


If you'd like to email me privately with your details so I can see how to try helping you and your family now and build up a picture for future admissions changes thatm ight be required.

Dear James,

I would just like to say 'Thank you'.

Sometimes people lapse too readily/quickly into criticism or into making the next demand/posing the next query.

I want you to know that your efforts to get more school places and the help and encouragement you have put into securing new schools, such as The Belham, is appreciated.

Jane

"I've done everything I can to ensure we have sufficient primary school places - initating and leading new free school campaigns and giving a great deal of support to all other local free school campaigns. "


Indeed you have James, and I applaud you for your commitment and efforts in this regard. You deserve recognition for this, from our community. Thank you

No, James, that's wrong. 80% got their first preference, 91% got their top 3.


If 150 families put unrealistic choices on the form, and the school hasn't got the room to expand, is that the Council's fault? There was a woman on the telly earlier on from somewhere up north whose kid didn't get into a school, and she was whining as she'd only put 1 preference - you would be alarmed at the number of people from the 150 families I am sure who probably only put 1 preference down.


It couldn't be that you are trying to make political capital out of people's disappointment, could it ?

I am always surprised when I see people moaning on social media because they didn't get a place at the outstanding school 3 miles away from them.


Everyone should look at the 6 nearest schools to their house and put those down in order of preference.


When people only put one school down I almost want them not to get it.

With the duplicate applications for the new Belham free school it will mean another 60 relatively local places being released as people choose either the Belham or whichever other school place they were offered.


But 160 disappointed families across Southwark is still 160 disappointed families.


This year does feel much better for primary school admissions. Phew!


If anyone has admissions problems - we're here to help. Ward councillors in East Dulwich ward and the surrounding wards.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With the duplicate applications for the new Belham

> free school it will mean another 60 relatively

> local places being released as people choose

> either the Belham or whichever other school place

> they were offered.


Depends from which schools they come from (perhaps undersubscribed ones like Heber) or if some come out of private education (I am assuming some will)


> But 160 disappointed families across Southwark is

> still 160 disappointed families.


I am intrigued as to what you think is a solution to this. Mine ? I would analyse the 160 "disappointed" families' applications and see just how many of them had only put one school, or had been completely unrealistic. Received wisdom is that it's Peckham and around there that has the highest proportion of disappointed applicants, despite there being an excess of places. An analysis of why people don't make realistic applications is probably long overdue.


> This year does feel much better for primary school

> admissions. Phew!


I hope so


> If anyone has admissions problems - we're here to

> help. Ward councillors in East Dulwich ward and

> the surrounding wards.


Or you could always try the Admissions people first !

And sibling place is different.


But I have heard several people on different occasions saying along the lines of "I'm only putting the one I want, then they'll have to give it to me". These people are idiots and deserve not to get what they arrogantly think they can bully their way in to.

I was once given the advice, by the owner of a nursery no less, that the way to get the school I wanted was just to put one school down, and then they had to give it to me. While people are giving out this sort of advice, there will always be mistakes made.


For what it's worth, I was rather surprised at the lack of information for parents on this process, particularly in ensuring that they applied in the first place. In Lewisham, parents are sent information packs, from what I'm told, whereas nothing like that happens in Southwark.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And sibling place is different.

>

> But I have heard several people on different

> occasions saying along the lines of "I'm only

> putting the one I want, then they'll have to give

> it to me". These people are idiots and deserve not

> to get what they arrogantly think they can bully

> their way in to.


Yep - I know someone who did this to - even after asking a fair few people what they'd do (all of who said DON'T just put one down). They were upset when - surprise surprise - they were allocated a school miles way. Could only think of the poor kid who as a result had a hell of a journey cross the borough to primary!


HP

> And sibling place is different.


People have realised with horror recently that the sibling rule is trounced by the religious rule in many schools.


> But I have heard several people on different

> occasions saying along the lines of "I'm only

> putting the one I want, then they'll have to give

> it to me". These people are idiots and deserve not

> to get what they arrogantly think they can bully

> their way in to.


If I had a pound for every time I heard this I'd be a rich person. See also "if I put 2 completely unrealistic choices 1 and 2, they HAVE to give me my third choice...

I would agree though that there is not enough info out there. I've also over the last few years seen lots of people upset because they basically choose the 5 best schools in their borough and put them down thinking they'd get in to one of them, and upset when they get in to none.

Is interesting reading this alongside a thread on the FB page of where I'm from up in Suffolk. There 6 children haven't been able to get into the only primary school in the village leaving them with journeys of 3 miles + with an hourly bus into the local town.


Makes tales of 1.5 mile journeys & 2 (regular running) buses to get to school in a new light.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...