Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmmm so gay characters have changed soaps over violence, murder, tram crashes and all the other ridiculous storylines that writers dream up?


Because they are just that - gay characters. There's no such thing as a gay storyline. There are storylines about falling in love, or out of love, or being cheated on etc. It just happens that sometimes the charracters involved are gay. Mostly though they are heterosexual. And it doesn't bother most people either way. The only fact is that you are bothered by it.

But aren't we talking about gay characters over gay storylines?


The only storyline I can think of that is specifically gay would be a coming out storyline. Otherwise we are just talking about storylines that could be equally asigned to gay or heterosexual characters?


I think your gripe is more to do with the number of gay characters? And you might be right (I don't watch all the soaps) in that suddenly gay characters are featured in a lot of storylines. Soaps have a tendancy to follow trends in order to attract viewers. So if one soap does something, and gets its ratings up as a result, all the others follow, no?


Personally, if I were a soap writer (and I'm not lol), I would be now writing a storyline around a jihadist grooming theme. THAT would be topical and bound to attract viewers and debate etc.


I agree that a gay character is no longer controversial, but it's a good thing surely that soaps now think nothing of having gay characters. I was a young teen when Brookside made Beth Jordash a lesbian, and remember how ground breaking that was. Being a bloke I thought it was great of course :D But seriously, I want a world where soaps speak to everyone (no mean feat) and I think we need to seperate characters (and their characteristics) from storylines, because the two are different.

I'm sick to death of the anti-gay sniping, failure to address equality issues surrounding LBGT , comments and general ignorance of homosexuality that goes unchallenged in faith schools. If you send your little darling to a faith school you had better hope and 'pray' that he/she is not gay

For some reason there are two identical threads, so I accidently posted in the other one.



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Is it just because it's gay stuff or would you feel the same if a similar lever of promiscuity was being shown between a hetro couple at that time?


I don't watch the soaps, but they are supposed to represent life in a community. Communities include gay people.

Your realism is not the same as most,you must consider how these issuses affect young mindsand the water shed was supposed to have been set up for this use. As for faith schools, they should be scrapped they are the most brainwashing cults still practicing in the twenty first century. So called holy men, just didnt want to work for a living.

Political correctness.is followed by i,s Aka as indescribable sxxt.

There are too many gay storylines all behaving badly.thats a fact.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your realism is not the same as most,you must

> consider how these issuses affect young mindsand

> the water shed was supposed to have been set up

> for this use.



I'm all for my kids growing up knowing that some people are gay and that's normal and fine.


But I'm not really all for them growing up watching soaps.



> As for faith schools, they should be

> scrapped they are the most brainwashing cults

> still practicing in the twenty first century.



I'm all for getting rid of faith schools, but that statement is a nonsense.

I stopped watching all the soaps years ago. I've no idea how many gay stories there are but most of the storylines are ridiculous so it makes no difference. Look at the amount of deaths that feature in soaps. It's hardly 'real life', just done to draw the viewers in. And a murder every few weeks, shown before the watershed. I think it's a bit silly complaining about something as silly as soaps when nonsense is to be expected.


Just watch something else instead.

According to most storylines the whole world is gay,

Its not, probably there are too many gay writers and producers and they are having a a field day.

Game of Thrones,is after the water shed by the way.

Faith schools have nothing to do with education and how do brain washing and intelligence work together .

The soaps will drop viewers, not many won awards this time. Maybe they will dissapear, and take all these soppy talent programmes with them,.

Simon Cowells pets have filled most of the jobs on t.v. his programmes have monopolised the t.v.Alan Sugars no marks are dominant too. The Voice is pathetic, and old Tom Jones should go back to his welsh care home,keep shouting,Oh yeah. We need our licence money back the football should cover their losses. T.V S..

rubbish.

Not sure of you're offended by the suggestion that homosexuality is normal, or that you feel it's overrepresented. But certainly the fact that you feel such storylines are inappropriate for children makes you look rather prejudiced.


But basically these are daft shows made for stupid, boring people, so probably best not to watch in the first place.

Yeah I agree Jeremy.


That last post from you Tarot says to me that you are scared of gay people, and their representation in programmes your children might watch. If you actually knew anything about sexuality, and it takes many forms, not just gay or heterosexual, you'd know that most people don't choose how they are. Do you really think all those heterosexual storylines are what make children turn out heterosexual? Tell me, how did you CHOOSE your sexual preference?


What is known from data, is that in the past, gay children suffered huge traumatic stress in having to keep their feelings secret. Imagine that Tarot. A world where 90% are gay and you are one of the 10% heterosexuals. You see no characters on TV like you and no-one ever talks about your straighness in anything but negative terms. Some people even wnat to put you in jail for it, or worse still hang you.


See how ridiculous your comments are?


But it seems you don't like much else on tv either. You don't have to watch. There are many other forms of content to watch. Netflix is very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...