Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

The Open


9.09am.......Boy Wonder is on the tee.


Have avoided backing Rory this time. I'm guessing on McDowell, Harrington, Villegas and Snedeker.....all on betfair.




But massive expectation from an English point of view, Donald and Westwood would be worthy winners and as I am practically English now, I would cheer them to the rafters....

Is this the betting thread?


I've gone for Watney "He's gonna get one one day" this is my 4th bet in a row on him for a major and at 38 means I've still got another 34 Majors for him to get one to make some money :)) Poor day today


and after some reasonably depth reserach on Betfaier golf forum...2 longshot yanks looking to trade - Davis Love (par today) 190 and Chad Cambell -1 today (sooo nearly -2) 470



I've also done Foster at 1000...........


one of those bets is a lie but James Lawton did tip him as an eaxchway bet in Today's Indie....I hope he had a piece.

Just traded a bit of Campbell at 40s, enough so I'm in profit on all bets and still in for a big win if he wins...letting Davis Love ride as he was only 150 so less room to trade but all my bets are totall freerolls now, still with big potential pay outs...will trade Love if he's still near the top tomorrow night, but a few quid to the good whatever.



...you still doing the lottery Mick?

Rory is about the only player I have not backed. Think the list is now 10, but most missed the cut so have now got Bjorn Campbell and Clarke. Clarke would only cover my losses.


Campbell and Clarke added at half way stage, but Campbell dropped today. He might fire tomorrow, who knows.


Ones I wished I had backed are Johnson and Fowler, they may be big threats tomorrow.


I fear for Clarke, as I backed him to win a major for years only for the pressure to get the better of him any time he was in with a shout - but hes older and wiser now and may be he has a new perspective on life and may get through to the end. I would love to see it.


I wonder if Rickie Fowler will look good value this time tomorrw as he is currently 7-1 ?


Now I have typed it I have to have some of that - dont I ?


PS

ok I have done Rickyyyyyyy now as well at 8.8 on betfair.


Surely I can't lose......


PS - I was at the open yesterday and I have to say, like most other sport, its better on TV. Only horseracing is better to actually attend.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I wonder if Rickie Fowler will look good value

> this time tomorrw as he is currently 7-1 ?


As long as he doesn't wear that white clobber again I don't care...



> PS - I was at the open yesterday and I have to

> say, like most other sport, its better on TV. Only

> horseracing is better to actually attend.


I agree Mick, I went to the 2001 Open at Carnoustie when Van de Velde famously went into the water, could hardly see a thing with all the crowds, and only realised how dramatic the hole was when watching it on TV later. Still, it was worth it to see Mrs Doubtfire lose his rag while teeing off because someone rustled a Kit Kat wrapper. :)

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one to think that any spectator

> yelling, "Get in the hole!!" should be immediately

> escorted from the course and given a life ban from

> any televised tournament?


Yes, along with 'You're the man!'...although I'm really disappointed no one shouted ''RICKAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!''

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...