Jump to content

Recommended Posts

want to take them for a special day out, but unsure which is more suitable for their age range... chessington obvs has the zoo which is great for everyone and is cheaper but legoland... well its legoland, so its bound to be amazing!


we will be going on a friday or monday to avoid crowds and expensive prices. which do you think would be more fun for them?

I went to Legoland last summer with similarly aged children. It is amazing but have to say it is so so massive that we could only do a fraction of what was there, and queues for the rides were 45 mins plus, which was hard to explain to a 2 and 4 year old. Plus my then 4 yr old is a bit of a softy and was too frightened to go on a lot of the rides. I went out of term time on a weekday and it was absolutely heaving. So not sure if there is ever a way to avoid the crowds. It is very expensive and I did leave thinking it would have been better value for money if i'd done it when my kids were a little older (my son is now 5 and a half and really into Star Wars so that alone would probably make it worth a visit as there is a great Lego Star Wars section). I'm sure there are some Legoland pros on here who can comment on when to go when less busy and how to avoid queues etc.


I haven't been to Chessington since I was a child so can't comment but would be interested to hear on this as we are thinking of going ourselves.

Lego land is better in the spring/autumn when the crowds aren't there and when your younger one is three as this is the cut off age for some rides, my daughter wasn't 3 at the time we went and got v frustrated at not being able to go on rides with her brother. Tesco do great money off vouchers for Lego land too so we got in at a fraction of the price.
Agree on Legoland. We went with my 2 and 4 year old in October, and there was lots to entertain both. Just to say, I don't think most rides have an age cut-off, it is mainly done on height restrictions - I think for some it's a metre but many are 90 cm. It's worth checking your 2 year old is within heights stipulated before going otherwise you will have to be split with one child able to do one thing and one another - may not work if there's just one adult!
Hiya, I cannot wait to do both (after remortgaging the house). I was told by another dad that his son was a bit disappointed as there was no (or not much?) Lego to play with at Legoland as it's more about the rides & displays? I am sure someone can tell me if that's correct, but it means I'll have to manage expectations...

They do have a lego day ... We went last year ... There were some tents with things to do


Use tesco sats out vouchers to get a day pass, then pay for qbots.

If you are with small children that must be accompanied on rides, you need only one per child. They start at about ?15


It's fiendishly expensive to actually pay at the gate


Get there before it opens, dash right through to the dragon rides then work back


Prioritise the rides, don't try to go on them all

Duplo world and water park and the free play area there are best plus the pirate performance


Best time to go is June or sept, well away from school holidays

Legoland is great, but I think you would have a good time at Chessington as well. Plus it is much easier to get to so you have the option of going for half a day. Young children get pretty tired at both of them so a full day may be too much. Chessington has lots of rides suitable for under 5s, plus the zoo and Safari(your 2 year old may be too small for the safari ride but you can still see the animals from the viewing platform), an aquarium and a soft play. I've been in October at the weekend to Chessington and not had to queue much for any ride, so I would have thought a week day this time of year would be fine.
How about Paultons? It's got peppa pig world in it, fabulous gardens, water play park, loads of kiddie rides outside of the peppa pig area and loads of easily accessible lockers for dumping swim stuff/picnic/coats. I found it to be far less frantic than legoland or chessington because there is just so much greenery to relax in/near when not doing rides. Really lovely park.
  • 5 weeks later...
Hi we stayed at the Hilton in Bracknell for Legoland, it's about a 20 min drive away but was surprisingly cheap on a Sunday night as part of a package with two days of park tickets. It has a nice pool & saunas which made it a treat. No kids menu for food though so the evening meal in the bar there was quite expensive. But so much nicer than the Legoland food we didn't mind! Having two days in the park was great and we all loved it. Our son was nearly 5 and I'm glad we waited till then to go - I think it would be quite frustrating/tiring for a two year old.

We stayed at the Legoland hotel. Pros: it's incredible exciting for the kids, the swimming pool in the hotel is good fun, you get into park early the next day, we went in autumn and they had Chima fireworks in the evening.

Cons: it's expensive, the food is awful, particularly if you have lunch in one of the restaurants in the park as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...