Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Heard the word "soz" a lot as a childling - was common to use "-z" to shorten a word ending in "-ry" - also worked on names ending in "-ry" (like Terry became Tez). Then I moved south and found out the norm was "Tel".


Now, about southern types not knowing what a bacon batch is...

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > preggers is old as the hills. And they are at

> > least 50.

>

>

> Didn't realise it had to be a new thing that

> causes me irrational rage - what's at least 50

> ted?


The hills?

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyNorwood Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > the-e-dealer Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > preggers is old as the hills. And they are at

> > > least 50.

> >

> >

> > Didn't realise it had to be a new thing that

> > causes me irrational rage - what's at least 50

> > ted?

>

> The hills?


The Hills Have Eyes?

Football headlines in the off season. Yesterday, with the commonwealth games in full swing and the third test firmly in England's hands, what was the top back page story in the Metro?


Footballer doesn't move clubs. What a non-story. But it's football, innit?


And the Metro is far from the only offender.

People who insist on London phone numbers being described in terms of the area code + the first digit of the telephone number, before they'll attend to the rest of it.

I.e. "my number is 020, 7890, 1234", "sorry, 0207, then?..."

020 is the area code for London. The first digit of your phone number does not form part of the area code.

Sometimes I'll just give the number, i.e. "7890 1234" and it'll blow their mind.

"Sorry, 7890, I don't understand.",

"It's a London number, add 020 if your dialling from outside London, which I know you aren't".

"er, OK, so 0207, then what is it?.."


ARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH

No it's not. 020 is the area code and only needs to be added to the number when calling from outside the area zone (i.e. from outside London). Numbers in London may start with a 7, an 8, or a 3 regardless of where in London they are.

http://www.area-codes.org.uk/020-area-code.php


"Despite London having had a single area code (020) since the year 2000, many people wrongly think that '0207' numbers are only for central London and that '0208' is for the outer areas. In fact, it is now quite normal for an (020) 8 number to be issued in central London, or an (020) 7 number allocated in the suburbs. Incorrect spacing reinforces misunderstandings and causes people to make incorrect assumptions."

Totally with you rahrahrah on the area codes.


Would add: bus drivers who have already slowed right down and then jerk really suddenly causing 'most everyone who's standing to fall into one another and into the railings etc.


Would add: people who abbreviate almost to 'most

Otta - you are exactly right, it's a hangover from 0181 / 0171, but it's been 020 for a decade and a half now. It drives me insane that I can't just give people my number without having to express it in erroneous terms. A little thing I know, but it causes me irrational rage. :-)

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> because of the below 8 is more likely to be outer

> and 7 inner London

>

> 2000 New London-wide code of 020 introduced. Local

> numbers lengthened to eight digits be prefixing

> with '7' in inner London or '8' in outer London.


... it's true that numbers which were in existence at the time of the change over in 2000 are more likely to follow that pattern, but it still doesn't mean that the first digit of the number forms any part of the area code for any London number.

Nope. You have to include the area code when dialing from your mobile. But the area code is 020. And if I where to quote a number to you, I would give it as 020 (pause) 8910 (pause) 1234 and get extremely upset if (as often happens) you made me repeat it by saying

"sorry, 0208, then what?"

I can't understand why after 14 years, so many people still cannot process a London phone number unless it is expressed in (the entirely erroneous) terms of the area code, plus the first digit of the number.


See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_telephone_code_misconceptions

But it makes so much more sense to split an eight digit number into two sets of four and to proceed it with the area code (or not, as really in most instances this should be implicit due to the fact that both parties know you're in London). Otta, please, you're killing me here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't he just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...