Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Heard the word "soz" a lot as a childling - was common to use "-z" to shorten a word ending in "-ry" - also worked on names ending in "-ry" (like Terry became Tez). Then I moved south and found out the norm was "Tel".


Now, about southern types not knowing what a bacon batch is...

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > preggers is old as the hills. And they are at

> > least 50.

>

>

> Didn't realise it had to be a new thing that

> causes me irrational rage - what's at least 50

> ted?


The hills?

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyNorwood Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > the-e-dealer Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > preggers is old as the hills. And they are at

> > > least 50.

> >

> >

> > Didn't realise it had to be a new thing that

> > causes me irrational rage - what's at least 50

> > ted?

>

> The hills?


The Hills Have Eyes?

Football headlines in the off season. Yesterday, with the commonwealth games in full swing and the third test firmly in England's hands, what was the top back page story in the Metro?


Footballer doesn't move clubs. What a non-story. But it's football, innit?


And the Metro is far from the only offender.

People who insist on London phone numbers being described in terms of the area code + the first digit of the telephone number, before they'll attend to the rest of it.

I.e. "my number is 020, 7890, 1234", "sorry, 0207, then?..."

020 is the area code for London. The first digit of your phone number does not form part of the area code.

Sometimes I'll just give the number, i.e. "7890 1234" and it'll blow their mind.

"Sorry, 7890, I don't understand.",

"It's a London number, add 020 if your dialling from outside London, which I know you aren't".

"er, OK, so 0207, then what is it?.."


ARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH

No it's not. 020 is the area code and only needs to be added to the number when calling from outside the area zone (i.e. from outside London). Numbers in London may start with a 7, an 8, or a 3 regardless of where in London they are.

http://www.area-codes.org.uk/020-area-code.php


"Despite London having had a single area code (020) since the year 2000, many people wrongly think that '0207' numbers are only for central London and that '0208' is for the outer areas. In fact, it is now quite normal for an (020) 8 number to be issued in central London, or an (020) 7 number allocated in the suburbs. Incorrect spacing reinforces misunderstandings and causes people to make incorrect assumptions."

Totally with you rahrahrah on the area codes.


Would add: bus drivers who have already slowed right down and then jerk really suddenly causing 'most everyone who's standing to fall into one another and into the railings etc.


Would add: people who abbreviate almost to 'most

Otta - you are exactly right, it's a hangover from 0181 / 0171, but it's been 020 for a decade and a half now. It drives me insane that I can't just give people my number without having to express it in erroneous terms. A little thing I know, but it causes me irrational rage. :-)

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> because of the below 8 is more likely to be outer

> and 7 inner London

>

> 2000 New London-wide code of 020 introduced. Local

> numbers lengthened to eight digits be prefixing

> with '7' in inner London or '8' in outer London.


... it's true that numbers which were in existence at the time of the change over in 2000 are more likely to follow that pattern, but it still doesn't mean that the first digit of the number forms any part of the area code for any London number.

Nope. You have to include the area code when dialing from your mobile. But the area code is 020. And if I where to quote a number to you, I would give it as 020 (pause) 8910 (pause) 1234 and get extremely upset if (as often happens) you made me repeat it by saying

"sorry, 0208, then what?"

I can't understand why after 14 years, so many people still cannot process a London phone number unless it is expressed in (the entirely erroneous) terms of the area code, plus the first digit of the number.


See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_telephone_code_misconceptions

But it makes so much more sense to split an eight digit number into two sets of four and to proceed it with the area code (or not, as really in most instances this should be implicit due to the fact that both parties know you're in London). Otta, please, you're killing me here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...