Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fatuous self-important superficial boring faux-local faux-informative ad-bloated lazy press-release-rehash Absolutely Dulwich magazine. Despite the 'no junk mail' sign, shoved, but only part-way, through my door each month. This causes five things to happen:


1. Potential burglars are immediately alerted to the fact that no one's at home.

2. The cold air goes in and the warm air goes out.

3. When I get home I have to go straight out again to put it in the recycling.

4. I feel intensely irritated.

5. Every time I see the letter box brushes still bent out of shape due to the rolled-up magazine being jammed there for hours I relive the irritation.

Hazard lights. If you put them on consider that unless your vehicle is fully exposed to other traffic it justs looks like you are indicating to come out of wherever you are badly parked. Other drivers only see both of them when they pass you.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe think of it like this. Someone who needs to

> make a few bob* is being paid to deliver them.

>

> *Explanation available on request if required.


Don't take your bad temper out on me, you patronising so-and-so. Shouldn't you be counting posts somewhere?

I don't have a bad temper RPC. I was merely trying to be polite in that the term 'bob' may not be familiar to younger people on the forum. It's old currency.It wasn't meant to be patronising. I think it's time for me to have a holiday.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:


> Despite the 'no junk mail' sign, shoved, but only

> part-way, through my door each month. This causes

> five things to happen:


'No junk mail' signs cause me not exactly irrational rage but mild irritation. Flyers, pizza menus, leaflets and free magazines unaddressed are not 'mail'. If something has been posted through the mail (ie direct mail advertising) the postman is obliged to deliver it regardless of what signs you put up.

You're conflating different things there. Magazines like that aren't delivered by the Post Office. Now that you mention it, though, the postperson often sticks a wodge of flyers through the door with the post and it does irritate me that they do this to raise PO revenue with no thought for the downstream cost in recycling. It's as though Southwark has to pick up the cost of bolstering the PO. Crazy really.


To me any printed stuff that's not addressed to me personally, or which is addressed to me but is the result of someone passing on my details (though clearly outside the power of the deliverer to judge this one) is junk mail.

It's the modern use of 'junk mail' that conflates things. As previously understood, 'junk mail' was unsolicited addressed mail, eg Reader's Digest prize draws etc. The Mail Preference Scheme should ensure you don't receve these. And you can sign up with the Royal Mail not to receive unaddressed flyers.


Not that I'm a fan of 'junk mail', but I don't understand why it's uniquely picked out as being 'wasteful'. What about the amount of energy and resources that go into TV advertising, billboards and other forms of unsolicited marketing? Printing up pizza leaflets could be seen as pretty modest by compmarison.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who talk about power "outages" rather than

> power cuts. Another Americanism.


I think that Power Outages may be due to Accidental damage..


Whilst Power Cuts are planned due to industrial action or political financial reasons like the 3 day week.

Conservative Government 1970?1974 to conserve electricity.


DulwichFox

Sports headlines heading an article that is really not news at all. For example:


England cricketer says: England can win world cup

Footballer says: We can win on Saturday

Tennis player says: I can win a grand slam


FFS - just do some of that journalism thing.

"Those jumpers that have the top of a shirt sown into them, to make it look like the wearer has a shirt on under the jumper"


I find these bewildering rather than rage-inducing. Is anybody willing to own up to actually having worn such an absurdity?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...