Jump to content
Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

Yama Momo, Lordship Lane

Chief

By Chief
in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

The title of the thread is the name of the restaurant, so it is relevant. There are too many multiple threads about the same subject on here.


Chief Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was not questioning the quality of the

> restaurant! So not really a relevant response to

> the issue I raised.

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

Not so with raw fish Fox. Fresh is considerably more important than with other food. It was also delicious, is that word allowed or do you have some bizarre reason for disallowing its use too?


DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To say something is 'Fresh' is not really much of

> an endorsement of excellence.

>

> One would expect as normal all food to be fresh

> in all outlets.

>

> "Well serve tea, coffee and Fresh Sandwiches.. "

>

>

> No one is going to say we serve 'Stale

> Sandwiches. ' ???

>

> DulwichFox

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not so with raw fish Fox. Fresh is considerably

> more important than with other food. It was also

> delicious, is that word allowed or do you have

> some bizarre reason for disallowing its use too?


You can use what ever words you like. even Fresh.

My point was that a restaurant should not need to say it's food was fresh.

That should be taken for granted .


Delicious is Subjective.. ?


It's only 'Delicious' if you happen to like raw fish.


I would not find it delicious, however fresh it was, or had had been prepared by Jiro ono

owner of Sukiyabashi Jiro, a three-Michelin-starred Japanese sushi restaurant in Ginza, Ch??, Tokyo.


It would still make me gag..


DulwichFox

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

It wasn't the restaurant that said it was fresh, it was me. I consider that to be a positive thing. I don't really care whether you like/don't like sushi, I do and those others who also like it might find the recommendation useful.


Anything else you'd like to troll on about?


DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not so with raw fish Fox. Fresh is

> considerably

> > more important than with other food. It was

> also

> > delicious, is that word allowed or do you have

> > some bizarre reason for disallowing its use

> too?

>

> You can use what ever words you like. even

> Fresh.

> My point was that a restaurant should not need to

> say it's food was fresh.

> That should be taken for granted .

>

> Delicious is Subjective.. ?

>

> It's only 'Delicious' if you happen to like raw

> fish.

>

> I would not find it delicious, however fresh it

> was, or had had been prepared by Jiro ono

> owner of Sukiyabashi Jiro, a

> three-Michelin-starred Japanese sushi restaurant

> in Ginza, Ch??, Tokyo.

>

> It would still make me gag..

>

> DulwichFox

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It wasn't the restaurant that said it was fresh,

> it was me. I consider that to be a positive

> thing. I don't really care whether you like/don't

> like sushi, I do and those others who also like it

> might find the recommendation useful.

>

Anything else you'd like to troll on about?


Re: Gay saturation.

Posted by edcam May 07, 02:02PM


Don't feed the troll.

--------------------------------------------

Re: Yama Momo, Lordship Lane new


Posted by edcam Today, 04:13PM


Anything else you'd like to troll on about?

--------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Triple Oscar winning actor in Dulwich!

Posted by edcam April 07, 12:03AM


Louisa is a troll.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Goodbye friend and foe, it's been a long journey

Posted by edcam April 07, 11:27AM


If she wasn't so repetitively troll-like,


You seem to be obsessed with calling other people Trolls. Take a look at yourself

befor you judge others..


DulwichFox

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam is right though... there are degrees of

> freshness, it's not just a binary "fresh or not

> fresh". And it's particularly pertinent when it

> comes to sushi.

>

> Foxy, somehow I am not surprised that you do not

> care for sushi. Doesn't seem like your bag..


Yeah. Not really a Fish person .. and don't care much for any cold food stuffs.

Not even cold curry.


I'm a Stew Casserole type of guy. Lots of hot (temp & spice) sauces.


Bread, Rice & Spuds. All restricted on my diet unfortunately :( Blood Sugar control


Talking of which just off to Curry Club. Yay.


Foxy.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

summer01 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was not much to fault about Momo apart from

> the fact that it wasn't exactly the busiest place

> we have ever been to.Samsung Galaxy S6 cover

> For those concerned about parking there is plenty

> in adjacent streets although the restaurant itself

> is located on a busy stretch of the North circular

> in Ealing.Samsung Galaxy S6 cover



Eh?! I think you're posting about a different branch?

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's your conclusion is it, Sue? ;-)



Eh?? If that's addressed to me, I haven't posted on this thread ??? Have you posted in the wrong place????


I've got no opinion on this restaurant one way or the other, I haven't been there and am unlikely to go there!

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's your conclusion is it, Sue? ;-)

>

>

> Eh?? If that's addressed to me, I haven't posted

> on this thread ??? Have you posted in the wrong

> place????

>

> I've got no opinion on this restaurant one way or

> the other, I haven't been there and am unlikely to

> go there!


EDF version of premature (Pavlovian) ejaculation?

Siduhe

Siduhe

Posted
Posted

Sue, I think you replied to a post on here saying you thought they must posting about another branch. It turned out to be a spam post (poster went back and amended it to put lots of links in) so the spam and your reply look to have been removed. Assuming I'm remembering the right thread...



Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's your conclusion is it, Sue? ;-)

>

>

> Eh?? If that's addressed to me, I haven't posted

> on this thread ??? Have you posted in the wrong

> place????

>

> I've got no opinion on this restaurant one way or

> the other, I haven't been there and am unlikely to

> go there!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Azalea
      Planning application for BT Street Hub on LL - unnecessary at best.

      By Azalea · Posted

      Pointless unless Southwark will make money from this being erected.  If that’s the case, it will be allowed.
    • Penguin68
      Planning application for BT Street Hub on LL - unnecessary at best.

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      Yes, there's no way anyone would want a Wi-Fi hub in Lordship Lane. Absolutely pointless. Anyone who actually wants or needs to communicate or access data will already have their 5G phone or satellite phone on them to get fast data. And of course we are lucky that we have such a strong and unbroken mobile signal from all suppliers locally. With no dead spots. 
    • ianr
      Planning application for BT Street Hub on LL - unnecessary at best.

      By ianr · Posted

      I see from the Site Notice https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/B867B0B45973C03BE4D45CE4513BDE35/pdf/25_AP_2825-SITE_NOTICE-4151698.pdf that the "Comment by" date is 5 November. My understanding is that comments submitted after that date can and ?will still be considered if the decision-making hasn't yet been done; so I wouldn't let the date in itself deter you if you  want to comment now.   Was the site notice actually posted near the location, btw? Does the hub have any claimed functions other than advertising?
    • concorde
      Planning application for BT Street Hub on LL - unnecessary at best.

      By concorde · Posted

      Whilst reading about what was Poundland, I saw that BT has applied to install (block the pavement with) one of its large screen advertising 'street hubs' outside the building. This seems like a terrible idea in my opinion - others may disagree - but you might want to look at the planning application and comment. There is still a day or two to do so.  Here's the relevant application 25/AP/2825 https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=T3G4H5KBH1500 and how it will look https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/BDF327FA0103A31946387A251B9C9D45/pdf/25_AP_2825-ELEVATION_PLAN-4143504.pdf

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...