Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure that the language used by thebeard is reasonable. I'd respectfully ask him to edit his post bearing in mind that we have youngsters on the forum too, and we'd hope to set a better example?


thebeard may be unaware that by posting the comment "WHY stick your nose into other peoples business?" he is by definition interfering with someone else's business... ;-)

I'm sure you're old enough to recognise the difference between talking about 'margins' and calling me a thick xxxx. You then follow up in that post with another direct attack associating me with female genitalia.


Your language is aggressive, offensive and unnecessary. Quite out of proportion with the context.


I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, nor teasing me as I have you. More power to you.


You should however be ashamed that you feel free to behave in such an unpleasant manner.


I once more suggest that you go back and edit those two posts, as they say more about you than they do me.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure you're old enough to recognise the

> difference between talking about 'margins' and

> calling me a thick xxxx. You then follow up in

> that post with another direct attack associating

> me with female genitalia.

>

> Your language is aggressive, offensive and

> unnecessary. Quite out of proportion with the

> context.

>

> I have no problem with you disagreeing with me,

> nor teasing me as I have you. More power to you.

>

> You should however be ashamed that you feel free

> to behave in such an unpleasant manner.

>

> I once more suggest that you go back and edit

> those two posts, as they say more about you than

> they do me.



HugueNOT Lets get something very clear!


I swore back after you started the swearing at me.


Admin have now edited the thread ????..


Up until then no $?%$?%%???$^$^??^?$ way would I start to engaged in 4 letter words.


Didn?t you didn?t realise this was a kids forum you?ve been on here far longer than me?

zephyr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Me thinks 'thebeard' is after a wordy fight.

>

> You don't happen to live there do you? Or are

> connected with it in some other way. You are

> protesting rather a lot about this particular

> thread.

>

> I still think the owners are trying to cash in on

> the blue plaque thingy.

>

> Oh..... and 'thebeard', I am allowed an opinion

> aren't I?

Opinions are Like ?*&?$ holes everyone has one, last time I looked we live?d in a free ish society.


I do not live there or have any contact with the property what so ever.


Since when was cashing in on something a bad thing?


I?m not sure they will benefit from the plaque. I?d probably avoid any house with a blue plaque on the wall it would put off quite a few buyers IMO.


It?s not about the House I don?t give a damn; it?s the attitude of the comments the shallowness the simple thought process the lack of balance which I find distasteful.


My opinion is good luck to them and let?s minds our own business.


If the planning system was any good, we?d all be living in decent housing, but it?s not so the majority of us have to make do with pokey second-rate homes.


The main reason property prices are high (still high even after the C.C.) is that there are not enough homes to meet the demand.


The NIMBYs are our major problem.


Plenty of opportunity to build decent homes but the planners politicians and NIMBYs get in the way.


And then they all complain that we don?t have decent housing and wow look at the price of that house its nonsense!


This house is one of a few decent sized houses we don?t build them that size now nor are we likely to in the future.

well, I think he started off okay, an opinion was voiced, but then had a sense of humour bypass and doesn't know how to get back on track.

Lots of regular posters have started off that way and it all comes good in the end, so take a chill pill beardy and get back in the swing of it.

"remarkably agitated, angry, about nothing much in particular."


Are you kidding?


How much is your house worth?


What brand of car do you drive?


Are your kids in private school or state educated?


Have you seen the colour your neighbours have painted their front door!


Yes I have a problem it's "idiots asking stupid questions and making potty statements and others sticking their noses etc etc. . . . .


Right that?s it where's my psychiatrist phone number?


A woman with a BEARD?


LOL

thebeard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "remarkably agitated, angry, about nothing much in

> particular."

>

> Are you kidding?

>

> How much is your house worth?

>

> What brand of car do you drive?

>

> Are your kids in private school or state

> educated?

>

> Have you seen the colour your neighbours have

> painted their front door!

>

> Yes I have a problem it's "idiots asking stupid

> questions and making potty statements and others

> sticking their noses etc etc. . . . .

>

> Right that?s it where's my psychiatrist phone

> number?

>

> A woman with a BEARD?

>

> LOL


No car, no kids, no school etc... Remarkably free of such trappings. And no a clue what colour any neighbour has painted any door.

Not sure about that I though a woman married to a gay man to cover up his gayness was a fag hag? Only married to one.


Isn?t there something about rugs and munching linked to the gay theme you mention?


I duno.


I always thought a beard was like a fungal growth on one?s face only hairy, blasted thing just keeps growing and growing.


I'd quite like Katie Holmes on my face tho.

As Asset mentioned dc, some guys start in that way.


There must be a bizarre list of crimes somewhere, that one would choose to get away with if "you're not caught". There is a group of witless individuals for whom that list includes insulting people online.


Mainly I think it's sad.

dc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not bothered by most of it but: "we live in such

> shit surrounded by scum" demonstrates a certain

> lack of respect for... well... everything and

> everybody.


Your Upside down world dc. Or mine?


I respect our right to decent housing which should not be kept down by envy or greed or a planning system which serve?s to keep incompetent architects, local politicians, bad/incompetent builders and otherwise unnecessary planning specialist employed. A system which fails to provide us all with good quality housing, a system which keeps prices excessively high.


I respect our right NOT to have to live next-door to drug dealing/using music blaring thugs strutting about spitting and swearing with no respect for anyone not even themselves.


Is there something fundamentally wrong there?


Simply we do live in a very oppressive unfriendly place where punch-ups are a regular occurrence outside the local bars and pubs and drug use is rife.


The quality of housing and the failures of the education system are IMO fundamental to our poor quality of life.


One might have more RESPECT if one was to correct/guide others behaviour rather than allow them to twist respect and carry on behaving in a way which is anything but respectful towards others?


But what do I know.


The same big BRAINS who caused the Credit Crunch are obviously behind our social system too?

Anyway, back to important matters of interior decor critique RE original 2 million pound house.


My personal feeling is that metal picture frames should run at no more than 2cm; that New England-style summer houses should be seen and not heard.. and I'm not sure why the bath is resting on a dog bowl. Other than that I'm always cheered to see personal taste exercised with thought, even if it's not to mine.


The one on Underhill looks like a giant went out on the piss, ate seven pizzas on the walk home and then chundered the semi-digested contents, layer by layer, back into each room.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Bumpkin I’d say feed and clean.    The RSPB say garden birds are low risk for avian flu but take precautions and clean feeders and birdbaths regularly.    Birds will be starting to nest soon and food you put out can at least feed the parents so they can feed live food to the young who can’t take seed yet.    It’s reccomended to wear gloves and clean feeders/birdbaths with mild disinfectant weekly. 
    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...