Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So just found out that Boris Johnson may have a lot to answer for; what did he say to the police that he met just before the protest's how did he say he wanted the situation dealt with, did he make it clear that he had no time for these "crustys" and they should be severely dealt with: 9 years under the last Major numerous protests and no incidents anywhere near on this scale i.e Manslaughter. If you have any doubt that the Conservative party have in noway changed their spots then this death and the manner in which the event was policed under a conservative major of london says everything. Apparently the tory spin machine picked this up on the day and have been in hiding ever since no wonder they want to raise this smear thing and keep it in the headlines, this is a disaster for any would be conservative government. This is Boris Blue Boy Johnson's leading article in the telegrpah a few days before the g20 summit...inflammatory or what ! No wonder the police were so heavy handed.


" the alienated children of the middle classes are planning to subvert the G20 summit. Across the desolate wastes of the Leftie internet, their wrathful campfires are already burning, and when April dawns they will surge like the orcs of Mordor in the general direction of the Bank of England."


What a nob this man is....surely he needs to be called to account, an open and public review is needed, he needs to be questioned.

Re: JetSetWilly's earlier assertion that the police will be shown in a more positive light in time re: Tomlinson


It's not looking that way yet, and getting worse day by day


I've been keeping abreast of this and what's shocking me is the lack of shock on the police side. Lots of policemen saying the coverage is one-sided and biase (and in the context of this story there is a bit of that) but not one of them wants to deal with the repercussions of what this actually means. Instead of addressing the issue head on, and the breakdown of trust that will ensue, they are adopting a seige mentality


Unimpressed

The 'new' still footage in the guardian makes them look, well even better. He's just standing on his own by a tree and some bikes hands in his pockets completely minding his own business when a group of 6 police walk towards him from a fair distance away and well.....beat him till he dies.....


any other footage or is it all in some government building somewhere being erased.

Sean, I'm not at all surprised.


The police have been doing this stuff for years, decades. They are not shocked because that is what quite a few of them have been doing all their lives. I was there for just a very few of them e.g. at a marriage ceremony in Brixton when the first Brixton riots broke out two hundred yards away and witness to just what kind of shit the police got up to then. I've seen things far, far worse than what we are seeing on all this video footage etc. Circa 1981.


The difference now is that just about everyone has a camera or phone with camera or camcorder or whatever. Before, there was never any indisputable evidence. Now there is. That's great. Just a pity that we apparently cannot now legally take pix of the plods. How convenient!


They are perhaps only shocked/surprised that they have been 'found out' in terms of public opinion in 'middle England'. They are not used to being on the front page of the Daily Wail pictured doing their mis-deeds.

Very interesting protest at the 'Den' today - outside the ground with i think some of his relatives and right in in front of the police a man dressed in a funeral directors top hat and tails shouting in town crier fashion


"justice for ian tomlinson, a Millwall supporter killed by the FILTH ! , never let the bastards get you down"


Millwall went on to win 2-0 then the stadium erupted into a slow chant of MURDERERS then a sedate pitch invasion ensued police formed a line across the pitch and there was a momentary face off and still came the chants MURDERERS.

Yes good, positive and helpful I am sure that the Suffragettes had to throw a few stones at parliment to get things changed !


And what dreamy society are you talking about H-0 ? the one that driven by rampant capitalism which has in turn fuelled globalization to fulfill it's own aim's is about to get decimated by wonderful new strains of flu that have developed as a result.


Next time you sentence the guy's behind the website Pirate Bay to Death you will be wearing a oxygen suit to do it ! I am sure however there will only be enough for the society you choose at the time.....much love my friend.

But what caused this acceleration of swine flu evolution? Probably the same thing that has favored the reproduction of avian flu. Virologists have long believed that the intensive agricultural system of southern China--an immensely productive ecology of rice, fish, pigs, and domestic and wild birds--is the principal engine of influenza mutation: both seasonal "drift" and episodic genomic "shift." (More rarely, there may occur a direct leap from birds to pigs and/or humans, as with H5N1 in 1997.) But the corporate industrialization of livestock production has broken China's natural monopoly on influenza evolution. As many writers have pointed out, animal husbandry in recent decades has been transformed into something that more closely resembles the petrochemical industry than the happy family farm depicted in schoolbooks. In 1965, for instance, there were 53 million American hogs on more than 1 million farms; today, 65 million hogs are concentrated in 65,000 facilities--half with more than 5,000 animals. This has been a transition, in essence, from old-fashioned pig pens to vast excremental hells, unprecedented in nature, containing tens, even hundreds of thousands of animals with weakened immune systems, suffocating in heat and manure, while exchanging pathogens at blinding velocity with their fellow inmates and pathetic progenies.


Off Topic or what - another thread maybe !

I think it's population that demands intensive farming, not capitalism. We should really by thanking our lucky stars that capitalism provides the investment and incentive to develop appropriate solutions.


Regardless, I'm rather staggered that anyone would imagine that the best solution for a law and order issue is to riot.

it's not a law and order issue though is it ? thats certainly not a definition of law and order killing a man becuase you fancy bashing some crustys ! Don't be staggered , a brick thrown from a mob will get you staggering !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...