Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am definitely GETTING old. I spend FAR too much time expounding on how great M and S merino thermals are. ("Recommended by the motorbike mags you know..." - Oh dear God- there I go again).


I think I may have to take to my bed as I can't bear the thought of stumbling round Dulwich in *shudder*...HEELS! Urgh.


>>

> OHMYGOD...In the name of God and all of his saints

> and angels!!!

>

> Darling wee quinnie, send those shoes right back

> immediately. The fact that they are silver just

> serves to make them look even more like something

> a matronly fifty year old tap dancing teacher

> would wear. No, no, no. The next thing you know

> you will be plucking your chin hair and wearing

> support knickers.

>

> No it is not possible to wear shoes that are

> comfortable and desirable. Chin up sweetie,

> shoulders back and walk tall.

D_C I don't think you want to marry me. From the replies I have had on here, it appears that I may in fact be Sebastian's frumpy sister Cordelia.




david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wee Quinnie - did you just compare me, as Moos

> suggests, to Sebastian Flyte?

>

> *faints*

>

> Will you marry me?

>

>

Oh man, I'm out of it for a day and all this going on?


WQ - wedges - ooh, looky looky but is comfort all it's cracked up to be?


This discussion seemed to bloom while I was having the lady equivalent of a waking wet dream in Liberty's shoe department last night. Hie thee hence - they even have some great flats (who knew such a thing were possible?)


and D_C - absolutely go for the hat, absolutely definitely. There's not enough raffish insouciance in East Dulwich I think. A little debonair style goes a long way

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>>

> Now, I'd like the favour returned... can a man

> under 60 (well 30 actually) get away with a panama

> hat? On holiday and at home!



The answer is no; sadly this does not stop my other half from wearing one....

Perfect wee quinnie, Uncle Jah is right. Go to one of those blingtastic nail bars on the Walworth Road and get yourself a glossy pedicure for ?20, then go to Westfield and buy yourself some virtiginous strappy sandals. You are so slim and elegant sweetie, go and show off.

Looks a bit draughty DM. What the hell, I'll turn the heating up full blast.



ulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Any site that suggests these for nightwear is best

> left for old ladies in institutions sweetie.

>

> Why not visit Agent Provocateur?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...