Thread Locked

[aquarius moon]

Excuse me! For what reason?

DC? Are you really David Cameron in disguise?

[Louisa]

More like David Dickinson.

Louisa.

[red devil]

Calm down dears, the thread was locked ethically, no animals were killed...

[aquarius moon]

Locked for what reason?

[Louisa]

This forum is a bloody dictatorship. You get blocked from talking about things some may find uncomfortable, you get banned from speaking your mind in general issues because it doesn't fit in with the vision of the forum (whatever that is?). Sick of it. We have rights!

Louisa.

[*Bob*]

Working up to your second flounce of the year?

[Louisa]

Get back in the cellar before I go and get my chain flogger.

Louisa.

[*Bob*]

mmmfffhh hhhssss uuuhhhhhh

[aquarius moon]

Some threads have gone on for days. Debating, disagreeing, arguing, swearing, falling out, calling names, nasty, nasty, nastier.

Tonight, one thread, a slight debate, not even time for arguments and DC locks the thread.

[red devil]

AQm, don't you think it might have been locked because it was only a matter of time before it ended up as Debating, disagreeing, arguing, swearing, falling out, calling names, nasty, nasty, nastier.?...

[aquarius moon]

So the 'It's not about what you know, but who you know' saying does apply on here, if you can block threads when it suits you.

And if Foxy want's to bring everyone's attention to the anti-fox hunting campaign, what's he supposed to do? Start an identical thread?

[edhistory]

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Locked for what reason?

Because Mr Carnell said so.

John K

[*Bob*]

AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any debate on the thread, only supporting views. I quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox hunting".

The Fox's wish has been granted.

[aquarius moon]

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQm, don't you think it might have been locked

> because it was only a matter of time before it

> ended up as Debating, disagreeing, arguing,

> swearing, falling out, calling names, nasty,

> nasty, nastier.?...

And? Aren't we allowed to then? They are all allowed to do it on the general election thread, house buying threads, cycling threads etc etc, but we are banned from doing so on this one?

I'm getting so sick of this forum. Most of the threads are of no interest to me, then something is, and I'm not allowed to speak.

Past caring really. I was going to post on the predictor thread earlier but am so used to talking to myself on there, I didn't bother.

[Loz]

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox hunting".

>

> The Fox's wish has been granted.

I think *Bob* is onto something here. It was such a strange thing for DC to do, maybe, just maybe, Foxy asked for it.

[DulwichFox]

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any

> debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox

> hunting".

>

> The Fox's wish has been granted.

Again *Bob* you are wrong . WRONG.

I did not say I only wanted supporting views.. I wasn't looking for ANY views. I said no debate.

Again.. It was just a link to a petition for people who wanted to sign it.

I could not of made it easier to understand.

The thread was in the LOUNGE. Where all the 'Bad' guys are sent. It should not of been closed.

It was closed because of some ones personal political view.

Like anyone who respects and supports Animal Liberty /rights has to be some kind of Radical 'Lefty' Anarchist.

DulwichFox

[Louisa]

If that is the case foxy then it really does confirm my opinion about the direction of this forum.

Louisa.

[keekybreeks]

what direction is that?

I have been oppressed and bundled into the longe in an orange jumpsuit about 30 times now.each time for nothing at all.probabaly

nothing has chamged

[*Bob*]

If you want no debate, Fox, I suggest you fire up the printer and sellotape some sheets of A4 to trees in the locality.

What did you expect? I mean, really..

[david_carnell]

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any

> debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox

> hunting".

>

> The Fox's wish has been granted.

This

[aquarius moon]

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that is the case foxy then it really does

> confirm my opinion about the direction of this

> forum.

>

> Louisa.

Me too.

I knew that Foxy wouldn't have done that.

I have an idea who it might have been.

And like I said in an earlier post, if I'm not allowed to have an opinion on the very few threads that I have an opinion on, I just won't bother posting anymore.

[Louisa]

I was bundled into the lounge for having an opinion too. Admin claimed it was because they wish to create a friendly atmosphere with no negativity. But from what I see of a large chunk of General Issues is a semi permanent home for a cluster of middle class nut jobs living in ivory towers. Hardly friendly is it? Oh unless you're part of the club.

ED circa 2015.

Louisa.

[*Bob*]

It's a wonderful irony.. Two people bemoaning the strangulation of debate and free speech - stemming from a thread where the OP dictated the terms of what was and wasn't allowed.

[aquarius moon]

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any

> > debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> > quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox

> > hunting".

> >

> > The Fox's wish has been granted.

>

> This

Sorry DC. I don't buy that. Foxy didn't ask for it, someone else obviously did.

I don't care now anyway. If I'm not allowed an opinion, I'll keep you all happy and shut up.

[red devil]

Exactly *Bob*.

AqM, if you feel so strongly about your right to debate fox hunting, why aren't you having a pop at Foxy for saying there should be no debate on the subject in his thread?...