Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Devils Ken Russell . 1971


After Grandier?s execution, Baron De Laubardemont visits Mother Jeanne preparing for her exorcism act in a neighboring town; this road show reverberates with the birth of Venus at the film?s opening?both theatrical perversions of the birth of love.


He throws her a bone, ?a souvenir? he calls it; it is, literally, a charred bone from Grandier?s body that looks very much like a cock and balls. In another censored scene restored, Mother Jeanne uses it as a dildo to commune with the man she loved and destroyed.


DulwichFox

Thought I'd actually look at the definition as I expect many confuse dildos and vibrators. Still reminds me of silly conversations when I was in my early teens at school and a fave silly joke about the lady who had a 'strapadictomy' operation. Interesting to hear that dildos are banned in some Southern US states.


So wiki defines this as


A dildo is a device designed for vaginal or anal penetration, usually solid and phallic in shape. Some expand this definition to include vibrators. Others exclude penis prosthetic aids, which are known as "extensions". Some include penis-shaped items clearly designed with vaginal penetration in mind even if they are not true approximations of a penis. Some people include devices designed for anal penetration (butt plugs) while others do not. These devices are often used by people of all genders and sexual orientations, for masturbation or for other sexual activity.


Well thers you go.

Dopamine1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the world would be a much more peaceful

> place if everyone 'took care of themselves' on a

> daily basis.



Agreed; with or without a dildo, according to their own preference. I don't usually bother using mine as it's quicker by hand :-)

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Salsaboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm ambidextrous by the way lol.

> >

> > LadyDeliah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lol, thanks for your kind offer Salsaboy :-)

>

>

> You'll need a snorkel.



I can breathe through my ears

Yep, sorted there!



LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Salsaboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm ambidextrous by the way lol.

> >

> > LadyDeliah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lol, thanks for your kind offer Salsaboy :-)

>

>

> You'll need a snorkel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...