Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think we?re asking the wrong questions. If somehow we can muster a thousands-strong army of police to attack, harass and abuse largely peaceful and law abiding people why aren?t they on the streets letting their aggression out on criminals instead?


The police are basically thugs (I know this as 2 of my best mates are police. Coincidentally, one of them will agree with me on this and the other will want to have a barney) but they are supposed to be thugs who are on our side. They are supposed to be out there giving what-for to the thugs who aren?t on our side.


We can, quite rightly, blame parents etc. but we employ this paramilitary style police force. Why aren?t they working for the public good?


Having to shoot someone yourself because there is no functional or interested police force is not the answer in a civilised country no matter how much of a bonner the idea gives some people.

This "mess" is here to stay Guys, the overwhelming majority of kids in Gangs join up to feel they are in a protective Family, as the overwhelming majority have little contact with any Father Figure and Mum is left to bring the Family up on her own, usually, while holding down 2 jobs as well.


So the hard-pushed Mother is often absent, thru' no fault of her own, as well.


There's often few Male Teachers in their formative years, as well to exarcerbate the situation.


Once these kids join Gangs there are "territorial" or "post-code" problems.


Add to that the ultra-competitive workplace and a desire to think its "cool" NOT to study hard in the case of most Gang Members and there chances of getting a "normal" job are severely limited.


However these same Guys are bombarded with daily images of the delights that money can bring so they desire money and lots of it, but how to get it???


There's one clear solution to their problems and its not what any of us want to hear but its the harsh reality of life, both now, and, most certainly, in the future.


I would heavily suspect that most criminally minded Guys will find the sentences they receive as being lightweight so again there's no deterrent and add to that the lack of a desire for people to get involved (even when they are victims themselves!) and its "Game On" for The Crims....and as its made so easy for them, canyou seriously blame them for accepting our gifts?


To add to the problem I know from many conversations with some "ne'er do-wells" as The Dogs and at Football that they will target people who they believe are least resistant and areas that they believe are least resistant.

Diddums. So daddy wasn?t around. They still get the same access to education, healthcare and housing as millions of other kids in the same situations who manage to become functional members of society.


If the police stop criminality from being an option kids will have to find other routes.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Diddums. So daddy wasn?t around. They still get

> the same access to education, healthcare and

> housing as millions of other kids in the same

> situations who manage to become functional members

> of society.

>

> If the police stop criminality from being an

> option kids will have to find other routes.


But Brendan some of these Guys are brought up on rough Estates where they are surrounded by Criminals displaying their "swag" and ill-gotten gains and seeing how easy it is these days for the "Crims" surely we, as a Society. can not blame them for taking something that is almost being handed to them with little meaningful deterrents....


We do not know the trauma these poor Guys went thru' without suitable guidance...

Why is it at this point I feel like referencing the Wire...


Surely the point is that yes anyone can say "well i was poor and I made it out" but at a societal level we know that the odds increase dramatically against that happening. Some people will make it out but mathematically the systems in place mean that it's effectively a quota


I don't want to be too bleeding heart about it and nor do I want to excuse any criminal behaviour - but if we are talking about root causes..

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So clean up the estates.


They HAVE been cleaned up Brendan!


Peckham, for example, is a much more pleasing and aethsetically better place than the old Peckham of The 1970's/1980's Five notorious Estates...some/most of them have been knocked down, Thank Heavens....

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is it at this point I feel like referencing

> the Wire...

>

> Surely the point is that yes anyone can say "well

> i was poor and I made it out" but at a societal

> level we know that the odds increase dramatically

> against that happening. Some people will make it

> out but mathematically the systems in place mean

> that it's effectively a quota

>

> I don't want to be too bleeding heart about it and

> nor do I want to excuse any criminal behaviour -

> but if we are talking about root causes..


EXACTLY Sean!


Some Guys are given little chance in life and the cardsare stacked against them so is it any wonder so many resort to foul play when life has been "foul" to them from the moment they left the Womb?:(

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So go on then Tone, spell it out - WHAT colour is

> the future?


"Colour" "Colour" you are beginning to sound like Admin...:))


p.s I thought I made a point of saying that I did NOT know but perhaps I did not empthasize it enough...but as a guess,as you did ask, ummmmm...sort of, well, kind of, you know, like a,,,Nah! I can't really describe my "vision"..I did try Sean.:-$

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you brought up the colour thing, not me. And you

> gave the impression that you had seen the future

> and you know what colour it is. So don't go all

> coy on us now...

>

> Either you know and won't tell us or you don't

> know and it MIGHT be orange!


TLS: "I've seen the future Brendan and though I don't know which colour it is"....


I've examined that comment from EVERY angle (even from under my computer desk) and whichever angle I view that statement from it seems to suggest that I do nae noooahh..( fingers crossed I don't get in trouble for impersonating a Geordie when I'm clearly not one...

However if you do want my "tuppence worth" I strongly suspect that most Families will move away from Inner London, to give their children a better start in life, as "they" perceive it.


I think most people will come to the conclusion, who are in a position to be mobile, that London is fine for the single life but not so great for raising a Family.


Certainly in conversations with Ex-Londoners, both in The Suburbs and in The CountrySIDE, I hear that over and over...

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh all right then, I'm being grumpy... hands up..

> you got me etc etc


Hate to say this Sean, as I like you, but I suspect (hopefully wrongly) that you are being more than grumpy and trying to take me to a place where I might be "Disciplined" (Ooh! Matron!) if I give the "wrong" answer, if you get my drift...

...

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not trying to take you anywhere Tony - you do

> like to "tease" a little sometimes.


You are right M8:))....and you're a Geezer....imagine the teasing you would get if you were a Lady who I was attracted to.....Shoot! I DO miss Office Life, sometimes..

At the risk of exacerbating this, I wasn?t talking about root causes I?m talking about practical solutions.


You can?t make people sort out their personal relationships but you can provide them with schools, houses, sporting facilities and a police force that will stop crime taking route in their communities.


So that?s 3 out of 4 then.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I really want to know, what is the answer?


To life daiz?....its as deep as the Oceon M8 and as long as a piece of string....all I know is that I have agreedwith everyone on here, as I have made a vow to be more agreeable in the future....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...