Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rupert Chumley-Worpingston writes: "If it is indeed the case that the ills of this government and nation are in some way attributable to a Scotch and Irish dominance then I fear for the Lions should the manager and captain derive from similar origins".


How can Chumley Worpingston credit the ills of this government to an Irish dominance?


And as regards the Lions - lets go again with a majority of below standard English players as Woodward did last time in NZ and ignore the Six Nations champions of the last two years and see how far we get. What English player deserves to lead the Lions.

What a pathetic comment.

Rupert Chumley-Worpingston writes: "If it is indeed the case that the ills of this government and nation are in some way attributable to a Scotch and Irish dominance then I fear for the Lions should the manager and captain derive from similar origins".


How can Chumley Worpingston credit the ills of this government to an Irish dominance?


And as regards the Lions - lets go again with a majority of below standard English players as Woodward did last time in NZ and ignore the Six Nations champions of the last two years and see how far we get. What English player deserves to lead the Lions.

What a pathetic comment.

How dare you compare this blue blooded peer to our Dulwichmum!!! The mother of Dulwich is sublime in her elegance that mirrors her conspicuous wit. The 'Viscount' you criminally compare our fairy of sarcasm to trots about town on a f@cking horse unlike our Des res DM who 'motors it up' in her chic Audi Q7. I think the forum and the plebs of Dulwich and it's surrounding areas will agree that there is only room for one Royal exile and that's DM.


P.s Don't let it go to her head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s irrelevant to compare Corbyns vote to Starmers. They were two different elections with two different turnouts.   The only relevant comparisons for Corbyn are how many people voted for Theresa May and Boris Johnson. A lot more in both instances. As such there would be nothing fair about him winning.
    • It is not Labour Party members who elect Labour governments, as it certainly isn't Conservative Party members who elect Conservative ones. It is all those who are not party members who actually make up the sufficient numbers to elect governments. 
    • Thanks for these responses. Yes, Cllr Browning & Cllr Hartley did a door-knocking exercise a couple of months ago. It was Maggie Browning who knocked and I told her that I'd had radio silence from Jon Hartley. She looked embarrassed but not surprised. I have spoken to him since, only after writting to Ellie Reeves, our MP about it his lack of response. He agreed to address the issue I asked about but I've not heard from him since. It's really not acceptable for an elected Councillor to consistently ignore his ward constituents. Since it's clearly not a one-off, I'm gonna pick this up formally. I'll let you know how I get on...
    • If memory serves, Labour under Corbyn got more electoral  votes than Labour under Starmer. So I'm not sure how you can call that being "unelectable"? Under a different and fairer electoral system Labour would have won. I see moves are afoot to bring in such a different, fairer system, presumably in the hopes of stopping Reform winning next time. BTW there was a mass exodus from Labour  by  the local (East Dulwich) Labour party members when Corbyn was kicked out by Starmer. It isn't just Islington who doesn't want to support  a right or centre right Labour party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...