Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rupert Chumley-Worpingston writes: "If it is indeed the case that the ills of this government and nation are in some way attributable to a Scotch and Irish dominance then I fear for the Lions should the manager and captain derive from similar origins".


How can Chumley Worpingston credit the ills of this government to an Irish dominance?


And as regards the Lions - lets go again with a majority of below standard English players as Woodward did last time in NZ and ignore the Six Nations champions of the last two years and see how far we get. What English player deserves to lead the Lions.

What a pathetic comment.

Rupert Chumley-Worpingston writes: "If it is indeed the case that the ills of this government and nation are in some way attributable to a Scotch and Irish dominance then I fear for the Lions should the manager and captain derive from similar origins".


How can Chumley Worpingston credit the ills of this government to an Irish dominance?


And as regards the Lions - lets go again with a majority of below standard English players as Woodward did last time in NZ and ignore the Six Nations champions of the last two years and see how far we get. What English player deserves to lead the Lions.

What a pathetic comment.

How dare you compare this blue blooded peer to our Dulwichmum!!! The mother of Dulwich is sublime in her elegance that mirrors her conspicuous wit. The 'Viscount' you criminally compare our fairy of sarcasm to trots about town on a f@cking horse unlike our Des res DM who 'motors it up' in her chic Audi Q7. I think the forum and the plebs of Dulwich and it's surrounding areas will agree that there is only room for one Royal exile and that's DM.


P.s Don't let it go to her head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...