Jump to content

Recommended Posts

First post so hello all! :)-D


I'm relatively new to ED and was wondering where it's possible to get to just outside of London from ED train station, or do I have to go in to LB and back out? I'm not that familiar with the south east.


Main reason is I fancy a bike ride away from the smog on the weekend.


Easy transit from ED and scenery are the main requirements, nice country pubs would be a bonus.


Cheers.

Alfie


there was a good thread about this a few months back- you can find it here

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,237034,page=1


I ended up catching a train fromPeckham to Eynsford which took about 30 mins and was fantastic - a short walk to fields, viaducts and an eagle sanctuary

What smog?

It's not the sixties, y'know!

And welcome, welcome.


A bit of a journey but another seaside countryside option is Whitstable. Train from Peckham Rye change at Bromley South. Lots of fab cycling along the coast. And a fabulous fish meal for the evening.

Ah, yes. Whitstable.


One place in the SE I have been to a number of times. I think that's mainly just the whole 'nearest bit of coast to London' thing though. Fanatstic seafood!


Was more after the nearest Kent contryside an easy train ride away, but thanks anyway.

Not direct from ED I know but if you cycle to Herne Hill, it's 45 minutes to Dorking and there is absolutely fabulous cycling around there (with the benefit of quiet back road routes signposted throughout the 140 odd miles of the Surrey Cycleway)

From West Dulwich station you can get out to Orpington and then catch a bus into some lovely little places like Crockenhill or Badgers Mount, with farmers market local produce some lovely pubs and garden centre and some decent bike rides/walks.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...