Jump to content

Recommended Posts

She's bleeding raving ! what is it with these luvvies - so what if her dad was a posh Ghurka - my dad used to drive an ice cream van selling UK ices in Turkey, but they ain't letting him stay here......it's a bleeding liberty.


I thought it was a simple point the minister made " it opens up a possible legal loophole , precedant, of retrospecive access to the uk for certain groups, this could put a huge burden on UK public services and I need to make sure I get this bit right"


Get back into the TV studio love and make some more ABFAB, we loved it. And don't come down Barry Road brandishing that big ole knife.....loony tunes or what !


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/defence/5292166/Joanna-Lumley-turns-screw-on-Gordon-Brown-over-Gurkhas.html

hey what a surprise the good ol BBC put's Lumley - Old Maid of the BeeB - on the headline leader above the trivia that is the unprecedented 50 BILLION POUND boost to the uk economy.....not even a thing about Graham norton's new contract, what is going on with this mob they must be slipping !!!!!!!!

Joanna Lumley is an intelligent and principled woman. Her articles in The Times some years back and other writings since prove she is far more than an easily led "luvvie".


Her father was a Major in a WWII Gurkha Regiment - his life was saved by a Gurkha soldier - posh or not that's a pretty good reason for supporting that particular regiment.


The campaign on behalf of the Gurkha's has been well managed and led intelligently.


To see J Lumley, yesterday, dictating policy on live TV to a glumly nodding Phil Woolas was to see a quick witted, knowledgeable and well briefed campaign leader run rings around an inept political placeman.

Listening to the radio this morning, apparently should ought to be the next Prime Minister.


It's easier to be quick-witted, knowledgable and well briefed when you only have one issue to consider. Lum had a spot of luck yesterday and played it well, but let's not start wetting our pants over it.

a lot of people have had their lives saved by a lot of people.


i sure if lum nuts came over peckham way and pulled out that big ole knife she likes to wave around someone would have to save her life pretty dam quick,


A it's no wonder someone had to save his life, he was probably riding around the jungle on a pennyfarthing in +fours and blowing a bugle !

My father was a Gurkha officer and three of them carried him out of the Borneo jungle after he had been wounded, it took almost a week.


Subsequently, over a period of 3 years he had his right arm amputated almost to the shoulder, but otherwise he would have surely died.


I served 23 years in the army and had reason to be thankful for their presence a couple of times, although I served in a different infantry regiment.


British soldiers fight for money too, it is called a salary.


"As I write these words my thoughts return to you who were my comrades, the stubborn and indomitable peasants of Nepal. Once more I hear the laughter with which you greeted every hardship. Once more I see you in your bivouacs or about your camp fires, on forced march or in the trenches, now shivering with wet and cold, now scorched by a pitiless and burning sun. Uncomplaining and endure hunger and thirst and wounds, and at the last your unwavering lines dissappear into smoke and wrath of battle. Bravest of the brave, most generous of generous, never had a country more faithful friends than you".

- Sir Ralph Turner



I am an ardent patriot (as opposed to Jingoist) and I feel ashamed to be British at this moment in time.


Could our ZaNu Labour Party misread the public mood anymore incorrectly.


I have never seen a Party try so hard to become unelectable in the 32 years I have been able to vote.


These people as a race have pledged their loyalty to Great Britain and they hold our traditions in higher regard than many of those that do already reside under the shelter of our free democratic system.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...