Jump to content

Recommended Posts

She's bleeding raving ! what is it with these luvvies - so what if her dad was a posh Ghurka - my dad used to drive an ice cream van selling UK ices in Turkey, but they ain't letting him stay here......it's a bleeding liberty.


I thought it was a simple point the minister made " it opens up a possible legal loophole , precedant, of retrospecive access to the uk for certain groups, this could put a huge burden on UK public services and I need to make sure I get this bit right"


Get back into the TV studio love and make some more ABFAB, we loved it. And don't come down Barry Road brandishing that big ole knife.....loony tunes or what !


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/defence/5292166/Joanna-Lumley-turns-screw-on-Gordon-Brown-over-Gurkhas.html

hey what a surprise the good ol BBC put's Lumley - Old Maid of the BeeB - on the headline leader above the trivia that is the unprecedented 50 BILLION POUND boost to the uk economy.....not even a thing about Graham norton's new contract, what is going on with this mob they must be slipping !!!!!!!!

Joanna Lumley is an intelligent and principled woman. Her articles in The Times some years back and other writings since prove she is far more than an easily led "luvvie".


Her father was a Major in a WWII Gurkha Regiment - his life was saved by a Gurkha soldier - posh or not that's a pretty good reason for supporting that particular regiment.


The campaign on behalf of the Gurkha's has been well managed and led intelligently.


To see J Lumley, yesterday, dictating policy on live TV to a glumly nodding Phil Woolas was to see a quick witted, knowledgeable and well briefed campaign leader run rings around an inept political placeman.

Listening to the radio this morning, apparently should ought to be the next Prime Minister.


It's easier to be quick-witted, knowledgable and well briefed when you only have one issue to consider. Lum had a spot of luck yesterday and played it well, but let's not start wetting our pants over it.

a lot of people have had their lives saved by a lot of people.


i sure if lum nuts came over peckham way and pulled out that big ole knife she likes to wave around someone would have to save her life pretty dam quick,


A it's no wonder someone had to save his life, he was probably riding around the jungle on a pennyfarthing in +fours and blowing a bugle !

My father was a Gurkha officer and three of them carried him out of the Borneo jungle after he had been wounded, it took almost a week.


Subsequently, over a period of 3 years he had his right arm amputated almost to the shoulder, but otherwise he would have surely died.


I served 23 years in the army and had reason to be thankful for their presence a couple of times, although I served in a different infantry regiment.


British soldiers fight for money too, it is called a salary.


"As I write these words my thoughts return to you who were my comrades, the stubborn and indomitable peasants of Nepal. Once more I hear the laughter with which you greeted every hardship. Once more I see you in your bivouacs or about your camp fires, on forced march or in the trenches, now shivering with wet and cold, now scorched by a pitiless and burning sun. Uncomplaining and endure hunger and thirst and wounds, and at the last your unwavering lines dissappear into smoke and wrath of battle. Bravest of the brave, most generous of generous, never had a country more faithful friends than you".

- Sir Ralph Turner



I am an ardent patriot (as opposed to Jingoist) and I feel ashamed to be British at this moment in time.


Could our ZaNu Labour Party misread the public mood anymore incorrectly.


I have never seen a Party try so hard to become unelectable in the 32 years I have been able to vote.


These people as a race have pledged their loyalty to Great Britain and they hold our traditions in higher regard than many of those that do already reside under the shelter of our free democratic system.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...