Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I am a single mum of a 4 and 1/2 yo boy. I have always wanted to have more children and am now seriously thinking about fostering into adopting. I spoke both to the council and to a private agency. Both seem happy to consider me when my divorce arrangements have been finalised and if these comply with their requirements. The only concern may be the fact that I run a business, although there could be ways to juggle with a job.


I was wondering if anyone has had relevant experiences and could give me thoughts?


Many thanks

Being a single parent with your own child, as you've already discovered, isn't a barrier to becoming a foster parent

or adoptive parent. I think your first step is to attend an open day run by Southwark or your local borough, to find out more. Check their website which will have links to the next sessions, where you will be able to meet parents who have been through the process, and who will give you an honest account of the rewards and challenges involved.


If you haven't already checked out Coram, they may be an appropriate organisation to approach. They run a concurrent planning scheme, which places very young children (under 2) who are likely to be placed for adoption, with foster parents who could become their permanent family in the future.


I'm sure you're aware, that most looked after children present with very complex needs, which often persist into adulthood, and it can be a very long road to recovery/emotional good health. So be sure that you have a very strong support network to enable you to manage the potential challenges ahead.

Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...