Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is a terrible tragedy but as has been said before with the exception of the broadcasters and traditional broadsheets there has been no steady hand or objective commentary from the media. The 'filth' most folk choose to read has been all one way for the British middle class family who came 'a cropper in Protugal' and now predictably things will go the other way. Before long a 'freind' of the family or an acquaintance will say how x or y has always had a temper or there was that time that Madeleine was spoken to 'harshly'. These papers peddle in filth and don't allow for justice to take its course.


Even on BBC brekfast you have these absurd questions being put to international fair trial experts as to whether the McCanns can expect a fair trial??? This Portugal not North Korea! How patronising and Xenophobic from the Beeb of all places.


I'm just glad the interviewee reminded them of which country this had taken place and the laws (the same as the ones over here) in place to 'protect' any, if the time arrives, accused.

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> C'mon spade, they wouldn't have had a chance to

> put her six feet under, in a heavy casket. That

> is why graveyards don't smell.


dosent have to be 6 feet under in a heavy casket, 2-3 feet in a bin bag would suffice, and i always thought graveyards didnt smell because of all the flowers left in them.

just got back from holidays and they're even talking about it in france and switzerland. whatever the outcome it seems to have caught people up like diana's death, that odd human bonding in tragedy.


as for the who done it? well what worries me is that with high profile cases like this the police are often under immense pressure to get a result which can lead to many a miscarriage of justice.

i totally agree jessie, surely the papers would not be allowed to print half the material that they are in the UK if the case was happening here as it could influence the outcome of a future trial. people have certainly 'got off' before claiming that the pre case press had influenced the jury.

As I've said before, not having the facts of the case I'm not going to give my opinion on the whodunnit aspect but I do wonder if anyone on the forum has changed their opinion of any newspapers since the focus shifted to the McCann's


Before: Suffering but dignified shot's of the parents + heart-wrenching pictures of Madeline

After: Evil looking pictures of a haggard mother + more angelic shots of Madeline


"fair and balanced" indeed

It's a nasty English/British approach to fame/celebrity and vulnerability - build them up, protect them, then knock them down and ostracise them. All the media bar none and many people are guitly of this.


Whatever the outcome I hope this proves sobering for those in need of it the most.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I remember in the 70s the Union Jack was similarly appropriated by the National Front and later the British Party, I regarded it in the same way many perceive the St George's flag today. The Union Jack went through a period of rehabilitation in the 90s and probably viewed more positively by the left today. I wonder though if the anti immigration groups who have appropriated the St George;s flag realise that St George was born in what is modern day Turkey.
    • Certainly there are issues with  immigration which need to be addressed, but setting fire to buildings with immigrants in them is not the way to address them. Many (not all) of these people are fleeing from terrible situations in their own countries, and I can't even imagine what it must be like to finally reach somewhere where they hope they will be safe only to be "greeted" with violence and hostility. It makes me ashamed to be English, not proud. And yes, some of these people are here illegally, some of them are criminals or perpetrate attacks on women or whatever. And are dealt with accordingly. I read recently, and I don't know if it is true, that over 60% of the men arrested at the scene of attacks on immigrants and their temporary homes have previous convictions for  or are known to the police for domestic violence. Maybe look at yourselves first, eh, before trying to imply that because a few  immigrants commit a crime here therefore they are all criminals and shouldn't be allowed into our country. Why would someone fly the English flag in the present climate for any reason apart from being anti immigration?  What is a very unhealthy view? Are you replying to me? Yes the immigration law badly needs to be amended. I completely agree. I don't think I've said anything which implies otherwise?
    • That’s a very unhealthy view.  Particularly when the very top echelons admit that the immigration law is out of date and not relevant and is being amended as we speak.    
    • The difficulty is that the English flag is now irretrievably (in my mind anyway)  associated with racist violent thugs. Obviously not everyone who flies it or carries it or displays it on their clothing  is a racist violent thug, but unfortunately when I (and probably others) see it flown or worn, that is what comes to mind. And religion is many things to many people, but to say it's for the "lesser minded" folk says more about you than about them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...