Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with you

> today?

> Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.


I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of icing.


*trumpets*


I think I've been in real life too long, my cyber-personality has become unhinged.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with

> you

> > today?

> > Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.

>

> I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the

> cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of

> icing.


It'll be fine Moos, provided we make sure that 'buns' is a reference to young mens' quite petit butttock cheeks.

I think I can see where the cinnamon-coloured ones would feature. There are places where that sort of tanning would be the norm.

The 'light glaze of icing', I can understand might be a particular treat of your own, and who amongst us would say you nay?

Not I.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is it with this chuffing forum, why are you

> all obsessed with bottoms? Stop it at once.

>

> Moosie Whitehouse.


I apologise for the cheek. That'll be the end of it then.

I'd arsek your forgiveness.

But if I did I'd probably have to make some comment about striking a bum note.

And then tell the world to 'pogue mahone', and frankly the bottom line is nobody should be forced down that road.

Still as REM once opined 'It's the end of the world as we know it'.

And they felt fine.

Weirdos.

HB, reminds me of the wonderful, wonderful Peter Cook and Dudley Moore sketch when they complain endlessly about gorgeous film stars constantly harrassing them (while continuously trying not to laugh themeselves):


Dud: and then I felt a hand on my cheek

Pete: (deadpan) Which cheek?

Dud: (long pause, lips quivering) Left upper

I am sorry, but F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion


proven misuse government property / sexual misconduct / strong runours of Visas for Sex / piss artistry / complete lack of tact - he is perfectly qualified to fit in with the present lot.


there is not room for people like this.

You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have been thinking?


The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic career to try and call the government to account for turning us into a nation that supports torture is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his pants.


With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating scumbags in office.


Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion"? ... Classy.

digitalronin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have

> been thinking?

>

> The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic

> career to try and call the government to account

> for turning us into a nation that supports torture

> is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that

> he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his

> pants.

>

> With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we

> ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating

> scumbags in office.

>

> Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray

> suggestion"? ... Classy.


thats me in a nutshell


Do you think Murray was railroaded into the job ? he knew the rules, he took the fat salary and got caught out.


NO better than an MP, but thats not the point is it

In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand against the use of torture at a time when too many poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye to protect their careers, he's not exactly leadership material.


A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being a good husband or father. And that book is painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Don't know what caught out means when he as clearly framed in order to appease the yanks who are still happy to support the regime in order to keep that gas in their sphere rather than the Russian one. Georgia mark two there may just be a matter of time.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand

> against the use of torture at a time when too many

> poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye

> to protect their careers, he's not exactly

> leadership material.


Neither are most MPs. The last thing the government wants is several hundred wannabe leaders.


>

> A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a

> borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify

> him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being

> a good husband or father. And that book is

> painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Crikey, he'd fit into the House really well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was talking to my brother in the law last weekend who works for a different water company. He said he and his colleagues watch TW’s woes with a mixed of horror, disbelief and then relief that they work for a different water company. Worth a watch. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00284vt
    • But Thatcher is dead. Nobody since has brought the utilities back under public ownership (if that's the right term). So there are many people who could be blamed. Meanwhile the shareholders get richer and everyone else gets increasing bills and a poorer service. Plus as said above, a massive waste of a limited resource like water. Not to mention the polluted rivers and seas. At least the privatisation of the railways is being reversed. Hopefully water may be on the list somewhere.
    • That's really helpful. Do the Community Councils still exist? It sounds to me that whoever the contact is on the council who has sorted out the North Cross Road notice board and put the new list of councillors in it must at least have access to the key for that one? Unless it was one of the unlocked ones. And of course if somebody knows where the keys are, they may have no idea that people are looking for them or that this forum thread exists. Which are the notice boards which are not locked?  The very helpful locksmith near the station (?Callows?)  might be able to provide keys for them, or if not, new locks, in return for some local publicity? In fact, they may be able to advise in general, rather than keep trying unresponsive people at the council. But then of course there is still the question of who is going to take responsibility for putting appropriate East Dulwich community information into them and updating it as necessary.
    • Our residents' association used to have keys many moons ago, but when locks were changed, we tried everyone (including ward councillors) to get keys to no avail. A couple of boards are not locked. The Community Councils originally paid for all the notice boards in Dulwich. May have come under the Cleaner Greener budget.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...