Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with you

> today?

> Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.


I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of icing.


*trumpets*


I think I've been in real life too long, my cyber-personality has become unhinged.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with

> you

> > today?

> > Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.

>

> I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the

> cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of

> icing.


It'll be fine Moos, provided we make sure that 'buns' is a reference to young mens' quite petit butttock cheeks.

I think I can see where the cinnamon-coloured ones would feature. There are places where that sort of tanning would be the norm.

The 'light glaze of icing', I can understand might be a particular treat of your own, and who amongst us would say you nay?

Not I.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is it with this chuffing forum, why are you

> all obsessed with bottoms? Stop it at once.

>

> Moosie Whitehouse.


I apologise for the cheek. That'll be the end of it then.

I'd arsek your forgiveness.

But if I did I'd probably have to make some comment about striking a bum note.

And then tell the world to 'pogue mahone', and frankly the bottom line is nobody should be forced down that road.

Still as REM once opined 'It's the end of the world as we know it'.

And they felt fine.

Weirdos.

HB, reminds me of the wonderful, wonderful Peter Cook and Dudley Moore sketch when they complain endlessly about gorgeous film stars constantly harrassing them (while continuously trying not to laugh themeselves):


Dud: and then I felt a hand on my cheek

Pete: (deadpan) Which cheek?

Dud: (long pause, lips quivering) Left upper

I am sorry, but F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion


proven misuse government property / sexual misconduct / strong runours of Visas for Sex / piss artistry / complete lack of tact - he is perfectly qualified to fit in with the present lot.


there is not room for people like this.

You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have been thinking?


The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic career to try and call the government to account for turning us into a nation that supports torture is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his pants.


With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating scumbags in office.


Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion"? ... Classy.

digitalronin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have

> been thinking?

>

> The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic

> career to try and call the government to account

> for turning us into a nation that supports torture

> is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that

> he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his

> pants.

>

> With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we

> ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating

> scumbags in office.

>

> Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray

> suggestion"? ... Classy.


thats me in a nutshell


Do you think Murray was railroaded into the job ? he knew the rules, he took the fat salary and got caught out.


NO better than an MP, but thats not the point is it

In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand against the use of torture at a time when too many poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye to protect their careers, he's not exactly leadership material.


A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being a good husband or father. And that book is painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Don't know what caught out means when he as clearly framed in order to appease the yanks who are still happy to support the regime in order to keep that gas in their sphere rather than the Russian one. Georgia mark two there may just be a matter of time.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand

> against the use of torture at a time when too many

> poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye

> to protect their careers, he's not exactly

> leadership material.


Neither are most MPs. The last thing the government wants is several hundred wannabe leaders.


>

> A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a

> borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify

> him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being

> a good husband or father. And that book is

> painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Crikey, he'd fit into the House really well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was sitting on the park bench yesterday opposite north Dulwich station and found an Apple Watch hanging off the corner. I have brought it home and charged it hoping that someone might use ‘find my’ to locate it. Equally happy to be contacted this way to return it to the rightful lender / they just need to say what colour/kind of strap it has. If you can think of a better way to return it / find its owner then please advise. And/or feel free to share on other local fora. 
    • How many are there in your racist category?
    • Precisely DR it’s entirely understandable to conclude one is so disillusioned by Labour for Tories, it must be time for someone else  That  is an entirely reasonable position But if the next step is to then transfer your vote to a party full of charlatans, snake oil salespeople and racists? Then  you stop being reasonable and start being thick and/or racist i understood why Tories took power in 2010. I feared it was an error but I wasn’t castigating people who voted for them tories (then, not now) and Labour are hamstrung not by civil service or EU but by a weird media and a weird voting system in an age of social media.  The answers don’t seem to be coming from them yet but voting reform will only damage the country internationally and internally  the Tories may yet regain power but are currently led by a madwoman, with a madman positioning himself to take over. Will take years for them to sort themselves out labour are making errors all over the shop but are at least in the ballpark of sane governanc.  In no way should this give them a free pass but in 2025 there genuinely isn’t anyone better  (and current polling for reform is meaningless - in any general election be it 4 years or 4 months their lack of accountability and standards will become all too clear)
    • > Or else it's a relatively thin trunk? Or a rather thick old trunk, covered in leaf growth?  Look at the damage caused to the end and right hand railings.  NewWave, any chance  of loading your neighbour's photo here?   Or anyone else with some good focused photos, from various viewpoints if possible?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...