Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with you

> today?

> Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.


I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of icing.


*trumpets*


I think I've been in real life too long, my cyber-personality has become unhinged.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Moos. Elephants? Buns? What is going on with

> you

> > today?

> > Sort yourself out and be Billy Smart about it.

>

> I'm sorry, HB. I just like buns. Especially the

> cinnamon ones, and the ones with a light glaze of

> icing.


It'll be fine Moos, provided we make sure that 'buns' is a reference to young mens' quite petit butttock cheeks.

I think I can see where the cinnamon-coloured ones would feature. There are places where that sort of tanning would be the norm.

The 'light glaze of icing', I can understand might be a particular treat of your own, and who amongst us would say you nay?

Not I.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is it with this chuffing forum, why are you

> all obsessed with bottoms? Stop it at once.

>

> Moosie Whitehouse.


I apologise for the cheek. That'll be the end of it then.

I'd arsek your forgiveness.

But if I did I'd probably have to make some comment about striking a bum note.

And then tell the world to 'pogue mahone', and frankly the bottom line is nobody should be forced down that road.

Still as REM once opined 'It's the end of the world as we know it'.

And they felt fine.

Weirdos.

HB, reminds me of the wonderful, wonderful Peter Cook and Dudley Moore sketch when they complain endlessly about gorgeous film stars constantly harrassing them (while continuously trying not to laugh themeselves):


Dud: and then I felt a hand on my cheek

Pete: (deadpan) Which cheek?

Dud: (long pause, lips quivering) Left upper

I am sorry, but F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion


proven misuse government property / sexual misconduct / strong runours of Visas for Sex / piss artistry / complete lack of tact - he is perfectly qualified to fit in with the present lot.


there is not room for people like this.

You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have been thinking?


The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic career to try and call the government to account for turning us into a nation that supports torture is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his pants.


With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating scumbags in office.


Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray suggestion"? ... Classy.

digitalronin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're right, Snorky, what could I possibly have

> been thinking?

>

> The fact that he gave up his entire diplomatic

> career to try and call the government to account

> for turning us into a nation that supports torture

> is obviously as nothing compared to the fact that

> he likes a drink and has trouble keeping it in his

> pants.

>

> With priorities like yours it's easy to see how we

> ended up with a bunch of corrupt, lying, cheating

> scumbags in office.

>

> Oh, and "F*ckoff with your Craig Murray

> suggestion"? ... Classy.


thats me in a nutshell


Do you think Murray was railroaded into the job ? he knew the rules, he took the fat salary and got caught out.


NO better than an MP, but thats not the point is it

In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand against the use of torture at a time when too many poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye to protect their careers, he's not exactly leadership material.


A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being a good husband or father. And that book is painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Don't know what caught out means when he as clearly framed in order to appease the yanks who are still happy to support the regime in order to keep that gas in their sphere rather than the Russian one. Georgia mark two there may just be a matter of time.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all fairness as much as I do admire CM's stand

> against the use of torture at a time when too many

> poliicians and civil servants turned a blind eye

> to protect their careers, he's not exactly

> leadership material.


Neither are most MPs. The last thing the government wants is several hundred wannabe leaders.


>

> A self confessed philanderer, adulterer, a

> borderline alcoholic, the tabloids would crucify

> him. A pity his integrity didn't stretch to being

> a good husband or father. And that book is

> painfully self aggrandizing isn't it.


Crikey, he'd fit into the House really well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...