Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitist*. (Louisa's lounged response)


Recommended Posts

Had to say this. Peckhamplex is a bargain by London standards and great value for money. But, I find it disturbing that people are saying if you don't like what's on offer in ED go elsewhere. I don't understand this mentality. People live in ED and don't want to have to go miles out of our way just because everything locally is ridiculously priced. The same argument about the demise of Iceland is relevant here too. I do not for the life of me understand how people can say it's great to live in an edgy part of town, then be happy to pay 35 quid plus for a cinema ticket. It's segregating the community based on where they can afford to be entertained/shop/eat/drink etc. Peckham is less dangerous now that at any time in the last 35 years or so I would argue, nonetheless it's still a trek for people who may already be on a budget in ED.


Louisa.

Yes it is Jah. You're staying people are supposed to walk from ED to Peckham maybe with young kids or not in full health? It might be easy for some people but not everyone. It's the assumption that people should like it or lump it. Why should they? I apologise I thought someone said 35 or 25 or something in that range. Either way, it's a heck of a lot more than Peckhamplex.


The cinema isn't the cause, it's a symptom of a wider issue that's the point. End of.


Louisa.

Jeez Louisa, if you want to argue about anything at least get your facts right. Someone wrote how expensive it was for two people to pay ?12.50 per ticket i.e ?25.00 for two tickets. Not ?35.00 per ticket. I haven't been to the new cinema as I rarely go to the cinema but I would go there as a treat as it IS LOCAL.


You might as well say that anyone in ED who has a car that's more than you or I could afford should go elsewhere as they are segregating the community.In 100 years 99% of the current ED community will be dead. Try living in the present as that's all you or I or anyone else has.

Alan Medic I corrected myself on the pricing, but added the caveat that either way the new ED cinema is still more expensive than the Peckham one. On those figures MORE THAN DOUBLE what you'd pay in Peckham! Why should anything on our doorstep be seen as a treat? So do the fine folk of Peckham see their cinema as a treat too?


The point about the car isn't relevant. I'm referring to people who through no fault of their own are incapable or unable to go out of their way every time they want to treat themselves. I didn't say the cinema was segregating the community, they are here to run a business, simple as that. But all the hype and nonsense that's gone on over the last decade and a half has allowed us to get to this point. I remember the old Odeon on Grove Vale, that was never overpriced. Granted it was some years ago, but if anything that further validates my point about not everyone being able to participate in the new retail and entertainment offerings of ED due to pricing.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I remember the old Odeon on Grove

> Vale, that was never overpriced. Granted it was

> some years ago


was that in 1952?



Have you seen the new Odeons? They're all over the country, across the land. In fancy places and shitholes alike.


They charge ?11.. or is it a bit more (?) So that's ... a full quid less than picturehouse. One pound.


Peckham is piss cheap! Not indicative of average cinema pricing almost everywhere else in the UK.




LOAD OF OLD SHIT

Or something like that is hardly a correction Louisa. Basically you couldn't be bothered to read the original post and bailed in with nonsense. The reason something on your doorstep may be seen as a treat is it might be something you wouldn't normally consider within your budget. We all have budgets, just some have bigger ones than others.Bit like cars really.


It just sounds like you are jealous. Are all the better off folk of ED nasty people? If you think so you should move elsewhere. It's a bit of earth on a small planet in a huge universe.

Yes we do Alan, but the budget of ED shouldn't have to be different to the budget of Peckham. That's my point. A neighbourhood starts off as 'x' becomes 'y' - and so those who've lived in 'x' before it became 'u' now must go elsewhere (despite maybe not being able to) just because 'x' can become (for arguments sake) 'xy'. It's all a unnecessary nonsense.


No one is being jealous here or calling people nasty or better or whatever. It's just an observation that not all businesses have to leave an area which remains a fair mixed community still. LL doesn't any longer accommodate for all those tastes in the surrounding roads, only some of them.


Louisa.

When I was younger the cinema in my home town had a space between the front row seats and the screen, which was filled with wooden benches for those who couldn't afford the normal price. If space is tight maybe they could remove some seats in the picturehouse to facilitate the less well off residents.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We don't want riff-raff in our cinema, so sod the

> benches idea.



Lol, and as a Peckhamplex patron, can we introduce a test to determine whether the hopeful entrants of said fine establishment know the proper meaning of words such as 'blud', 'shank' and 'ratchet ho' so we can keep the twats out?

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > We don't want riff-raff in our cinema, so sod

> the

> > benches idea.

>

>

> Lol, and as a Peckhamplex patron, can we introduce a test to determine whether the hopeful entrants

> of said fine establishment know the proper meaning of words such as 'blud', 'shank' and 'ratchet ho'

> so we can keep the twats out?


I was refused entry to the Peckhample as I failed to use 'innit' correctly in a sentence when challenged. Wasn't my fault - I thought they said 'Inuit' and I started chatting about Eskimos.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I was refused entry to the Peckhample as I failed

> to use 'innit' correctly in a sentence when

> challenged. Wasn't my fault - I thought they said

> 'Inuit' and I started chatting about Eskimos.


Loz needs to read a little about "inuit" and "eskimos".

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I was refused entry to the Peckhample as I

> failed

> > to use 'innit' correctly in a sentence when

> > challenged. Wasn't my fault - I thought they

> said

> > 'Inuit' and I started chatting about Eskimos.

>

> Loz needs to read a little about "inuit" and "eskimos".


And to think I accused you yesterday of having no sense of humour...

If Picturehouse charged ?5 then you very soon wouldn't have a cinema in East Dulwich.


Cinemas are expensive. They are also expensive to run, and the margins on films are tight. The margins on popcorn and drinks are huge, and this is where Cinemas make the money. Picturehouse add a bar, restaurant and the regular stream of membership income to this and therefore can offer a slightly wider variety of films - not just those that rely on a popcorn-guzzling blockbuster crowd.


The PeckhamPlex is an outlier for ticket prices, not worth comparing anything to it. They too make their margins on the food and drink. By getting lots of people in the door they sell more of it. I imagine their rent per/m2 is also very low for a cinema. Their projection is fairly shoddy - and imagine they therefore don't have to pay back as much in VPF as a more expensive 4K projection system in use at picturehouse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...