Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do any of you follow a particular trend i.e rock, trendy, the dreaded 'Bromley boy' etc....? The reason I ask is because I'm sitting in here in a pair of ripped jeans and an old work t-shirt and I couldn't care less. I do however look awesome in the majority of my eclectic wardrobe in which ever combination. Sensible answers only.......who am I kidding......fire away.


P.s I never wear hats.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6462-trend-setter/
Share on other sites

This is exactly the sort of thread that is sending regular forumites running for the door.In the name of God and all of his lovely saints and angels. Yet another of "those" threads. Really now Mr Wolf, how bored are you exactly? Do you have to start every single thought that occurs to you as a thread sweetie?The next time you dream up a thread like this sweetie, why don't you just raise your hand and place it over your mouth.


Where is all of the intelligent bantor gone from this forum? Where are all of the witty threads that we used to have on here?



If I throw a stick, will you leave?(realises that skirt is tucked into knickers, blushes and backs towards the door)






As I am a complete & utter moron who cant find a/the library/broadsheet/book/string together an appropriate response, I here by offer an "assembled montage" of anothers hand


I think it says it all Foxie.....i mean stick to Art sweetie.....you were getting somewhere there.....really.. (IMHO ....yetchhh)



*OO*




*god this is far, far ,faaaaaaaaaaaar easier............chases stick .. *

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6462-trend-setter/#findComment-207444
Share on other sites

This may come as a bit of a surprise Wolf but my mum is a not a fashion designer so this is actually a subject I'm not interested in. I see what you mean though.



W**F




*like shooting fish in a barrel......why did I not try this new form of "reactionary reflectionism"(I made that up bet your impressed, well I am ) before

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6462-trend-setter/#findComment-207446
Share on other sites

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Before this deviates & gets to silly back to the

> clothes.....today i'm mainly waring

>

> Vintage Levis 501xx (selve edged)

>

> Lacoste polo in baise green

>

> White leather converse

>

> Uniqlo boxers

>

> A black Brompton bike

>

> A tan , a smile & all my own hair

>

>

>


God, this is as tiresome as Emily and her lower middle class, mass market brand drivel at the charidee shop.


>

> W**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6462-trend-setter/#findComment-207451
Share on other sites

Colanders are very cutting edge at the moment. Bloody kids always get the drop on us adults when it comes to fashion. Here I?ve been spending most of the last two weeks in a sieve.


I think perhaps it?s time for me to just give up and get myself some of those white trainers that are so popular with the polo playing community.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6462-trend-setter/#findComment-207795
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...