Jump to content

Recommended Posts

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> im sorry too woof, really . Each crime is

> different .



Yes true but does killing someone repay society?


No. Each persons death brutalizes us, we don't step up we fall down.

Sorry to hear that Wolfie.


I do believe though, that if there is absolutely no doubt that Bombers, for example, who have deliberately tergeted their victims have lost and forfeited all their rights to exist.


At the very least, they would not be able to cause any more deaths.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> daizie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > im sorry too woof, really . Each crime is

> > different .

>

>

> Yes true but does killing someone repay society?

>

> No. Each persons death brutalizes us, we don't

> step up we fall down.


I have to applaud the grace of your position, woof.


It gives comfort to know that humanity prevails in the face evil and loss.

Interesting statistics since 1970 in the US 133 people have been totally exonerated of the crimes for which they had been previously sentenced to death.


Only 1 in 700 murders result in a death sentence and only 1 in 325 result in the sentence being carried out.

This is always an emotive subject, and I guess people's minds won't be changed. I would ask those of you who are pro capital punishment. Would you be the one to pull the trigger? Would you look at the person in the eye, what ever they'd done, and end their life? Even Albert Pierpoint ended up being against capital punishment.
So one dead man, then add another is an equation of justice. Get a grip. That's revenge & if you think it satisfies your ego stick with it. I can tell you when in your darkest hour the hardest truth is, it "revenge" solves nothing,how can you get your own back, you can't & your loved one is not coming back no matter how much hate & fury you feel. The real liberation comes ultimately from acceptance, facing the truth & dealing with it.

Keef Wrote:

Would you look at the person in the eye, what ever they'd done, and end their life? Even Albert Pierpoint ended up being against capital punishment.


I could not do it, personally as I haven't got the temperament.


The main Saudi Executioner inherited the role from his Father and gets his Son to keep the sword in razor-sharp condition.


It does not affect him at all, as he believes he is doing his duty by The Grace Of God.

and what about when some years later it turns out you killed the wrong person and he was totally innocent of the crime you'd killed him for?

Or imagine your son, brother, father wrongly convicted and now dead because of the death sentence. How do you think that would affect his dependants and their view of society and justice?

BBC: "Saudi executioner tells all"



Beshi says his job does not spoil his social life .


Saudi Arabia's leading executioner says he is "very proud to do God's work" and does not lose sleep over beheading several people in one day.

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and what about when some years later it turns out

> you killed the wrong person and he was totally

> innocent of the crime you'd killed him for?

> Or imagine your son, brother, father wrongly

> convicted and now dead because of the death

> sentence. How do you think that would affect his

> dependants and their view of society and justice?


There would have to be not a semblance of doubt.


It would be disastrous to eliminate the wrong person, I agree.

So how are you going to make sure of that Tony? The statistics on miscarriages of justice are frightening. If you are banged up for 30 years for something you didn't do, at least you can be released and try to recover some of your life. You can't bring an innocent person back from the dead tho, so i don't think the death penalty is ever justified, cos if that was someone i loved killed by the state for something they hadn't done, i think i'd end up a very angry individual indeed.

Oh we are in Saudi now or want to be, gosh how wonderful.... I just love that idea of freedom.


All that oil & heads rolling all day long sounds like utopia. What makes me laugh with the it's "ok in Saudi model" is if you separate the oil wealth then the royal status , you are left with a "subject" state ruled by fear & injustice


If cutting off peoples heads worked as a deterrent then why do they need to employ a family chain to carry out the deterent that clearly doesn't deter.



Move there if you like it so much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't access the article - what's the gist?  I took the markets getting jittery when she was crying at PMQs to be a sign that they trusted her. But maybe it was because they were simply worried about any form of instability.  The NIC hikes have stymied the economy, which we could all see a mile off. Will a wealth tax improve things? Does anyone here think the trickle down has any impact and that chasing out the super rich will help things? Or are we just seeing off the biggest contributors to the economy? And has the Kwasi approach ever worked anywhere else?  Economics is not my strong point at all, I'd love to know others' opinions, but it seems to be she has few options, especially as the party is so divided. 
    • does either of them have a surgery? probably not over summer, but I thought they had to give the opportunity for their constituents to meet them.
    • MaryT, I’ve contacted the Dulwich Hill councillors several times in recent years, always copying them both in. I have never had an acknowledgment from Jon Hartley (not even an automated response or out-of-office) nor had any response or engagement from him regarding the issue raised.   On each occasion, only Maggie Browning responded (she uses an out-of-office if she is away). The last time, I received no response from either for 3 months, until Maggie Browning emailed me to apologise for not responding and asking if the problem had been resolved.
    • The  Kwasi effect is being considered. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...