Jump to content

Recommended Posts

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a millwall fan I'm sure you've witnessed football violence, hooliganism and racism at first hand. It is a credit to the game that people like yourself refused to bow to fringe elements and committed to remove them from the terraces.


TLS: Sadly, right back to Blackburn and Carlisle fans being attacked in the Mid-1960's. I remember the cry of "Bastards" coming from a poor Lady accompanying her bloodied b/f who only came down to watch a game of Football in peace.


DC: Incidents like Hillsborough and Heysel led to a public outcry over fan behaviour at football grounds. Coupled with increased police presence at trouble games and increased arrests, over time the rate of crime dropped.

I would also summise that a difficulty in recruiting new members, an ageing membership of crews and a new rofessionalism that occured with the advent of the Premier League were all factors in declining violence.


I understand and accept those points but it is really very simple DC.


They ran riot in those decades because The Police, generally, did not have a clue. The Police gained "intelligence". Took the necessary measures and made it much more difficult to commit crime in or near Football Stadia.


The other salient point was voiced, time after time, on a recent Sky Documentary when most "Old-Skool" hooligans said it wasn't worth the risk anymore as "5 years" was far too high a price to pay for enjoying a good ruck, basically.


The deterrent of the increased longetivity of their punishment combined with the additional Police presence were the determinant factors.

Ahh "a Sky documentary" - the ultimate source of authority on all matters concerning football hooliganism and it's continued glamourisation. It wasn't presented by Danny "Diamond Geez" Dyer was it?


Like I said Tony, I'm willing to believe that stiffer sentences had a part to play (although I doubt it tells the whole story) in this particular example but I don't think it's a useful enough example to use for society in general.

david_carnell Wrote:


Ahh "a Sky documentary" - the ultimate source of authority on all matters concerning football hooliganism and it's continued glamourisation. It wasn't presented by Danny "Diamond Geez" Dyer was it?


How the deuce did you know that(!)B)


Most football hooligans will feel that they have "too much to lose" these days.


Which I take to mean that the stiffer sentences now render this as not worth it, especially as many have children to support (poor souls)...

Yes, children. That's what I wads getting at when I talked about an ageing membership and difficulty in recruiting new members.


You don't fancy getting a black eye or a couple of busted ribs with a wife and nipper at home.


I would also heavily link violence, both in football and in society at large, to economic prosperity of a country. Ergo recession = hooliganism.

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think hooliganism is linked to culture too - I remember doing some research on this about 20 years ago...


Absolutely to our eternal shame.


I remember the friendly Scandinavians and Norwegians back in the day on my European Holidays and how I wished we could be more like them.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Imagine every child could be tested, and we would

> know for certain that one would grow up and do

> terrible things like this murder, but they could

> be treated at a young age, and this could be

> avoided, but it would be at the tax payers

> expence.

>

> Would you rather spend that money, or just kill

> them when they were young, before they could do

> any damage?



Like a cross between "Minority Report" and "Clockwork Orange"?


I think this one is just a little too far fetched, even as a hypothetical question!

david_carnell Wrote:

I would also heavily link violence, both in football and in society at large, to economic prosperity of a country.

Ergo recession => hooliganism.


It doesn't help but I don't buy that, really. We have been Football hooligans since the late 1960's and we have not been in recession for 40 years.


Also our recent "austere" Decades were The 1940's/1950's and Football hooliganism was non-existent then, in this Country.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey I'm out of breath reading this lot.

>

> As YOU were ( did you like the YOU.....ohh its

> like a knuckle sandwich....dofff)

>

>

> *OO*

>

>

> *takes to his day bed*



I think it was Issac Newton who said


Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy.

???? Wrote:

the decline in Footbsll hooligsnism IS proof thst draconian punishment does work as an effective detterent.....once people started getting 5 years rather thsn a ?50 fine all but the truly mad gave it up.


Wish I had thought of saying that:-$



TLS @ 4.20PM "The other salient point was voiced, time after time, on a recent Sky Documentary when most "Old-Skool" hooligans said it wasn't worth the risk anymore as "5 years" was far too high a price to pay for enjoying a good ruck, basically. "

What are you trying to say? target the victims? If you read my post you'll see it's about the law not its enforcemenht -I'm suggesting tht the courts desl with those that carry knives in a harsher way and given an example of when thid worked in the past
well you said "I'd like to see the law get as heavy handed with knife carrying as they did with football violence." i thought you meant as in the police ! i suddenly had visions of them on horseback charging into teenagers with hoods ....cue riots !

We are all not far from singing from the same hymn sheet.


Some believe that rehabilitation and compassion for people with broken lives are the way forward and others, like myself, believe that certain crimes should be punishable by amputation of the right hand, administered, naturally, under anesthetic. Indeed, If the thief repents and makes restitution before the case is brought before a judge, the punishment can be reduced. Aggravated theft can be punished by cross-amputation of a hand and a foot. Flogging would be suitable and acceptable in some cases for certain crimes, as well.


Obviously, for more serious crimes some of us feel that more severe punishment is necessary.


So a bit of fine tuning and I believe we will all be of common accord.:)-D

Tony - on this rare occasion we are in agreement. A good summary.


Atila - you're anger must have blinded you to the obvious. Football violence was used as an example of tough policing and stiff sentencing as an answer to crime. Something you seem to advocate in between your spit-flecked rants.


Others feel the picture is more complicated and that draconian punishments are not the most useful way for society to progress.


Now, your opinion is always welcome but try to contribute more than a sweary version of a Sun headline or just go back to the football thread and picking fights in pub car parks.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony - on this rare occasion we are in agreement.

> A good summary.

>

> Atila - you're anger must have blinded you to the

> obvious. Football violence was used as an example

> of tough policing and stiff sentencing as an

> answer to crime. Something you seem to advocate in

> between your spit-flecked rants.

>

> Others feel the picture is more complicated and

> that draconian punishments are not the most useful

> way for society to progress.

>

> Now, your opinion is always welcome but try to

> contribute more than a sweary version of a Sun

> headline or just go back to the football thread

> and picking fights in pub car parks.



You really are a patronsing and condescending bell end aren't you. Do you honestly think your opinion is more worthy than anybody else's view. You must be more up yourself than I gave you credit for. To read your views anybody would think you have a monoply on reasoned argument. What a tool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...