Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Definitely... we run a small computer training company in ED, and regularly get asked for local or nearby acommodation for one or two nights. We usually end up recommending places near London Bridge, as there's pretty much nothing around here that you would want to inflict on someone you didn't hate. Let me know when you open!


Paul

www.ubiq.co.uk

Hotel looks good! Though unless students are more generously provided for when I was one I dunno how many of them will be able to afford the 'budget rooms' (with shared bathroom) - at ?89.99 / night.


I'd be interested to see what literature on the local area they have in the foyer (Karaoke night at the 'Silver Buckle', anyone?)

I've only been to the silver buckle about 3 times, and actually I've had a real laugh, and no trouble each time.... However, there have been fights in there on each occasion too... :-S


Back on subject, it would be great to have a local B&B, but I fear that with the property prices in ED, the room rates would be huge just to cover the mortgage..... Hope I'm wrong....

I wouldn't disagree with most of that, Alan. I'm just saying students aren't often able to spend ?89.99 on a room for the night - so it's odd that the article trumpets them as one of the hotel's target potential guests.


Mrs *Bob* has visited the (old) Karaoke night at the SB.. alas I have only ever been on the outside looking in (on the way past en route to The Castle, usually)


Back to the hotel:


A travelodge is ?60/night en suite in London, I think.

This hotel is ?120/night en-suite


So the price is comparable - but only if you double it.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I right in understanding that there's some tax

> efficiency with mortgages and B&B, in that the

> interest on the mortgage can be set back against

> tax? Could be an effective 'sideline' business in

> that respect: secondary income, like...?


also capital gains implications, the other side of the coin.

Alan.. there's a double room with ensuite available at Travelodge (Battersea) next Thursday. It's ?60.

Shall I book you in?


It was you who said "The PRICE is comparable to a travel lodge"


Obviously there will be NO COMPARISON between this hotel and a Travelodge. But it does cost 100% more, so the PRICES are not COMPARABLE.

Alan - if by "The price is comparable", you mean that it is possible for one to compare the prices, then yours is a very unusual argument indeed!


The Great Eastern is ?400 a night, so you may as well say that this is also comparable to the Travel lodge. So why would you choose the Travel lodge, when the Great Eastern is so much nicer, and charge comparable prices??

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

It's also

> near to Hoa Viet- the best Vietnamese restaurant

> there is.

>


Off-topic for this thread I know, but I have to ask where Hoa Viet is? I've had such a hard time finding good Vietnamese food in London.



Thanks

Pedants.:))


Kathryn, if you can't manage a B&B because the capital outlay + capital gains tax makes it unattractive, one could make a few bucks by creating a local 'spare room community'.


There would be a website,which would organise payment online, and of course be the focal point for the bookings and an insurance service perhaps.


The site could charge a 10% service fee, and act as some sort of arbiter (like a 'star' rating) to allocate prices based on size and facilities?

No need to get touchy Alan... nothing personal, I'm just having difficulty seeing your side of the argument here.


Anyway, I would also like to add that a decent B&B is a great idea. A friend of mine (actually, my friend's Mum!) ran the London marathon last year, and stayed in a place on Barry Road, and apparently it wasn't very good. And I've also heard bad reports on here of the rooms above The Uplands. So I'd say that a nice B&B would be a welcome addition to ED.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...