Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Cheese Block are apparently so incensed by this story they have got behind the poor child in question and decided to begin selling materials for everyone to begin marking the pavements in solidarity.


Apparently they're changing their name to 'Chalk and Cheese'



*gets coat*

Going back some 35 years we lived on Pymers Mead, west dulwich. We used to chalk on the pavements of the Estate, drawings, coded messages, hide ans seek games. Things that kids do. Our immediate neighbours came round once with a bucket and suggested that we clean it all off. My mum went into a rage and told them that if they didn't like it they should clean it themselves.

All the house's had the living room on the second floor so that all the living rooms looked onto each neighbours patio. My brother to get them back chalked a huge penis on the patio. No neighbour could look out of their window without seeing it.

The offended neighbours came round to insist that it be removed. My mum refused.

It did rain a few days later and the chalk image vanished.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All PCSO?s do is hassle children, homeless people

> and beggars. I have seen them telling a nine year

> child to cycle on the road or face a twenty pound

> fine. They didn?t know that children under 16 are

> allowed to cycle on the pavement. When I

> challenged them they said ?they often cycle up to

> people and steal their mobile phones and we have

> to nip it in the bud?. I pointed out that if they

> suspected this child of being a phone thief they

> should do something about it. They replied they

> didn?t, so it was a stupid argument. Two of them

> in Manchester last year watched someone drown

> because of ?health and safety?. They are a waste

> of space and money.



nothing to do with "health and safety", they were observing the 1st rule of rescue/resuscitation - risk to rescuers.

020 7639 8175

This is the number for the Community Wardens covering the Nunhead and Peckham Rye Area.

If the road in question is not in this area, the person answering may be able to tell you the number for the relevant area.

You could phone them up and ask what this nonsense was about stopping kids chalking hopscotch grids and pictures on the pavement.

Or not.

lenk Wrote:



> I think you miss the point of them.

>

> In the same way that 'bobbies on the beat' do

> nothing to quell crime, they just make frightened

> voters feel like something is being done - so do

> community officers serve to provide a visible

> reassurance to people who spend their every waking

> hour afraid of being a victim of crime.

>

> So there's little point in them being out at night

> when no-one will see them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From Southwark Community Wardens website:


Community wardens


What is our role?


To reduce crime and anti-social behaviour

Community warden schemes provide a highly visible, reassuring presence and can deter crime and anti-social behaviour. We also work closely with the police, reporting crime and suspicious behaviour as it happens. Our partnership with the police is crucial to the success of our schemes.


Most crime and vandalism happen at night and not between 9 and 5

gerritsmith Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Most crime and vandalism happen at night and not

> between 9 and 5



The only words of any substance in all that fluff are "highly visible, reassuring presence"


IE Community wardens are essentially smoke and mirrors and an exercise in voter appeasement - a cheap way of 'being seen to be doing something'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no topic - just a usual unfounded hit and run from cancerian. No his speech wasn't disgraceful and no he hasn't lost his job   What else is there to say on the matter?   (the subject of Lammy's speech is where the thread has gone and that seems logical)   So do we think the racist is a racist?   Even if he isn't (and he definitely is) , Farage is wrong about everything.   Brexit? wrong. Truss? Wrong. 2 weeks ago he was wanging on about Argentina's Milei being the future and now look at Argentina - and people want THIS for the UK??? Some people have no sense of proportionality - yes Labour have had a weak first year, but looking at the alternatives they are easily the safest ship we have to choose from right now)
    • Possibly & possibly but let's get the thread back on topic ie Lammy.
    • Hi all,    we are planning an extension and were wondering if anyone has any experience with PlusRooms.  They seem to be all over East Dulwich so curious they’ve never been discussed in the forum!   Any thoughts or experience (even gossip) welcome! 
    • I've got to disagree with your numbers there - you're comparing apples and oranges. Support for the scheme has reduced from 53% prior to Starmer's announcement to 35% after it, opposition to it has increased from 19% to 49%, but 35% of the public still support it, not -14%. That is impossible + the lowest it could be is 0%. Net approval has decreased from +34% to -14%. The Guardian story seems like a hatchet job on Starmer's popularity and it makes you wonder what their agenda is, given the rumours around a leadership challenge. Starmer has clearly done a f*cking dreadful job on articulating any benefits of the system - if, indeed, there are any - but he's not helped by unverified social media stories about the involvement of Blair's son, stories which have been denied by all parties involved.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...