Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At least in Lambeth there is a high frequency tube service, hire bikes and cycle superhighways. In Southwark the strategy seems to be to make driving more and more difficult, whilst having no fast and frequent public transport alternatives.

I drove at 20 through the speed camera on Sydenham hill this week and found that I had to go into 2nd gear to maintain it without the engine complaining but even then the revs were higher then doing 30


It begs the question of pollution being higher with cars travelling at 20 compared to 30


Most modern cars have been designed to be efficient at 30mph and not 20


Wonder if there will be a legal challenge to the slower speed limits in the future

This response I had might answer your question


Further to your subsequent question below, my response is as follows:


The council does not receive the income from traffic speed cameras; we understand that the income from them goes to Transport for London/Metropolitan police and then on to HM Treasury.

Yours sincerely,

John Williamson


Business Services Manager


So why did TFL go along with lowering the speed limit?


If they had said no that would have been it. Again just for the money

I stupidly went past this camera doing 20-something this afternoon and remembered this thread. I'm now waiting for my first ever speeding fine to arrive. It's very hard to remember to change down when the traffic is moving at 30. I'm all for driving with due care and attention but I'm finding it very, very hard to do 20 on the 'fast' roads.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertises times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
    • My memory, admittedly not very reliable these days, places the shop on the block on the left hand side just before Burgess Park going towards Camberwell. Have also found a reference to Franklins Antiques being located at 157 Camberwell Road which is on that block. This is a screen shot obtained from Google maps of that address which accords with my memory except the entrance door was on the right hand side, where the grey door is, rather than in the centre.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...