Jump to content

Water torture


jimmy two times

Recommended Posts

gallinello Wrote:

Tony Benn, mild-mannered democratic socialist, champion of just, working-class causes; are you feeling alright, TLS?


Some of us have photographic, elephantine memories gallinello!


For example, when Doctor Beeching decimated The British Railways Network back in The 1960's and destroyed The Communities of many working-class people, who do you think sat right next to him at The Press Conference explaining and detailing how our Transport infra-structure was going to be wrecked?


Who do you think aided and assisted him in this and did NOT exactly "champion" the working-class cause?


Why that nice Aristocratic socialist "champion" WEDGIE!!


p.s The only line out of Grinstead that survived the axe was EAST Grinstead, which by REMARKABLE CO-INCIDENCE was Beeching's own line at the time!, the road to it is now called "Beeching Way"..


"Champion" Socialist--More "Champagne" Socialist and Hilary has followed on his proud tradition....:)-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anthony Wedgewood-Benn, was born a fully-fledged aristocrat, the son of Viscount Stansgate. Sir John Benn was a Baronet before that.


He was described as an "Old Testament prophet" who "immatures with age" by Harold Wilson, while he was part of his 1964-70 Government.


He was a great supporter of that other "mild-mannered democratic socialist, champion of just, working-class causes", namely,Arthur Scargill, who tried to bring down The Country, at the time...:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will contact him on this one; his responses, unlike yours, TLS, are normally clear, concise and rational.

I couldn't possibly respond to this alleged "wrecking" and destruction of working class communities through station closures.

It's obviously something that had a deep effect on you and your elephantine memory, leading to hateful thoughts and murderous images of pain and torture for the alleged perpetrator.

Therapy time for you, me ol' TLS!

The sun is shining, have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gallinello Wrote:

I will contact him on this one; his responses, unlike yours, TLS, are normally clear, concise and rational.



TLS:If are having difficulty comprehending either of my 2 postings regarding The Horrible Gentleman, then allow me to elaborate.


Which part of the above do you fail to understand gallinello?



gallinello: I couldn't possibly respond to this alleged "wrecking" and destruction of working class communities through station closures. It's obviously something that had a deep effect on you and your elephantine memory, leading to

hateful thoughts and murderous images of pain and torture for the alleged perpetrator.


TLS:If you were a member of one of the Communities in, say. Cornwall, that suddenly became "detached" then your attitude might be somewhat different I would expect. As it did NOT, presumably, affect you adversely then "sod 'em!" eh! galli?


What an altruistic socialist view...


Seems like the sun you mentioned, shines out of this Politician's posteria....B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I reckon they'd be queuing up to be quite honest.

> Anyway, I have made my position clear. It is as

> follows:

> 1.Death penalty for Sadistic murderers who are

> done bang to rights

> 2. Chemical castration for Paedophiles

> 3. Torture to extract valuable information from

> terrorists

> 4. Corporal punishment and /or torture for

> hardcore drug dealers

> 5. All the above for Arsenal fans and cyclists who

> mount pavements.



You've just over reached yourself, careful you don't have people accusing you of placing spittle flecked rants on here and saying that you are a far right supremacist taking on vigilante duties in your spare time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is called R v Brown and others. A group of

> consenting adults was caught (don't know how)

> doing various violent things to each others

> private parts. They had a password, so that they

> could yell out in pain, but the activity would

> carry on, but if they yelled the password it would

> stop. Various people in the party were charged

> with assault type charges (to be fair, not sure if

> anyone was actually charged with torture). The

> question up for consideration was whether a person

> can legally consent to that kind of assault - if

> they could it wouldn't be an assault. It was found

> that they could, but the poor chaps in question

> were still convicted - of offending public morals.

> Not sure what that adds to the debate really but

> when studing the case I had a jolly good chuckle

> at reading various barristers terribly serious

> submissions to the court of appeal about the true

> nature of nailing genitals to a plank.....


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


L.E


Was this the case where various men consented to scalding/electrocuting and inflating each others scrotums.


In a private club, as you do ?


W**F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You've just over reached yourself, careful you

> don't have people accusing you of placing spittle

> flecked rants on here and saying that you are a

> far right supremacist taking on vigilante duties

> in your spare time.


Come on Mr A.. without wishing to labour a previously made point, the spittleranting element wasn't in the content itself, it was in the presentation.. ie shouting F**K every other word and topping it off with a C**T. Fair enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all


I am replying to the views expressed about drug users and dealers by some on this thread; i e that they are so heinous that they deserve to be water boarded, or Police should be alowed to treat them violently.


I have actually worked in drug and alochol rehabilition for 16 years, and I have still to meet an evil person. I have, however, met many people who have done terrible things, to themselves as well as others. Above all, everyone I have met has been someone trying to do their best, albeit badly.


Be sure of this; Dulwich has many dealers and users. There is a view that Cannabis is not really "drugs" and that buying and selling on, (at for example a festival) is harmless. (and therefore OK, which it is not!) One of the more interesting and humorus things I have often come across, is that in the community of dealers and users, there is a lot of snobbery; cannabis users at festivals won't see themselves as problem users, but see heroin users as the pits. Crack users, look down on heroin users. Everyone looks down on glue sniffers, and so on. Generalisations I know, and questionable, but very common.


Drug and alcohol misuse is endemic at all levels in our society; no one deserves to be judged as evil, and no one deserves to be tortured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> legalbeagle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It is called R v Brown and others. A group of

> > consenting adults was caught (don't know how)

> > doing various violent things to each others

> > private parts. They had a password, so that

> they

> > could yell out in pain, but the activity would

> > carry on, but if they yelled the password it

> would

> > stop. Various people in the party were charged

> > with assault type charges (to be fair, not sure

> if

> > anyone was actually charged with torture). The

> > question up for consideration was whether a

> person

> > can legally consent to that kind of assault -

> if

> > they could it wouldn't be an assault. It was

> found

> > that they could, but the poor chaps in question

> > were still convicted - of offending public

> morals.

> > Not sure what that adds to the debate really

> but

> > when studing the case I had a jolly good

> chuckle

> > at reading various barristers terribly serious

> > submissions to the court of appeal about the

> true

> > nature of nailing genitals to a plank.....

>

> --------------------------------------------------

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> L.E

>

> Was this the case where various men consented to

> scalding/electrocuting and inflating each others

> scrotums.

>

> In a private club, as you do ?

>

> W**F



Indeed it is. Though being a girl I wouldn't know for sure what men do in private clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rgutsell Wrote:

no one deserves to be judged as evil, and no one deserves to be tortured.


Oh! I don't know, though.


Only last week a work colleague of my friend was in Court after her "evil" heroin addict Partner disappearred with a Woman he met at Re-hab(!). He used to steal all the kids "toy" money, while she did 3 jobs to keep them afloat.


This time she flipped and put her nails deep into his face when she found him with her. Thats after she battered her and put her fingers in his nose and spread his nose as far across his face as much as she could.


Thanks to our Legal System, it was only her 2nd recent offence ( she ran over a Guy who she had a disagreement with and then ran over him again, in case she missed any of his bits the first time) and was fined......?125..lol


She was driven to this by her heroin-addicted Partner though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>For example, when Doctor Beeching decimated The British Railways Network back in The 1960's and destroyed The Communities of many working-class people, who do you think sat right next to him at The Press Conference explaining and detailing how our Transport infra-structure was going to be wrecked?


Who do you think aided and assisted him in this and did NOT exactly "champion" the working-class cause?


Why that nice Aristocratic socialist "champion" WEDGIE!!<<<


There's probably a few things that can be laid at Benn's door, but blaming him for any sort of substantial role in the Beeching Axe is pretty bizarre. It was not his decision to renege on the manifesto promise to halt the line closures - he was onlt a junior minister after all - and the whole Beeching thing had started several years previously. And using a quote by Harold Wilson, of all people, against him strikes me as being fairly counter-productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SimonM Wrote:

...was onlt a junior minister after all - and the whole Beeching thing had started several years previously. And using a quote by Harold Wilson, of all people, against him strikes me as being fairly


Guilty by association ( in both cases):-$


He was just building his own career then so b+gger the people and the manifesto. He was going places and did not want this "cause" to shackle him.


Viscount Wedgie-Man of the People Dem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
    • I did see a few Victoria bound 185's on East Dulwich road around 5pm this evening. Coming from the Rye end and heading toward Goose green
    • I cant quite pinpoint where she is exactly. But currently notice I am not hearing her this evening!! She has a microphone? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...