Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Celia Hammond do an extremely good job and I believe most of the people who work there are volunteers. Whilst racism in any form is abhorrent this is probably one individual and perhaps it would be better to speak to one of the managers there rather than casting aspertions on the whole organisation.
I know they do a good job with the rescue cats which is why I stated that I got my 3 from them. My complaint would be to the head of the organisation because in this day and age no-one should be speaking like that in an open workplace. I hasten to add that it was only the one person saying those things.
Yeah they do a great job but some of their staff are soooooooo rude its unreal. I wont take my cats there anymore even though I rehomed them from there. Theres only a couple of people there that are willing to help or have any idea about how to talk to people. Its such a shame because they are a great local charity that do some brilliant work-just a shame they havent employed charity minded people
If you let it go then the manager will not learn anything. I think you should write a letter of complaint to the person above her. She wont get sacked but they will tell her to act more professionaly at work and be careful what she says in future. You cant change peoples views but you can change the way they behave at least.

I got my 2 cats from Celia Hammond about 4 years ago and the woman that showed me round could not have been nicer. Since then I have always encouraged people thinking about getting a cat to visit Celia Hammond first. But about 6 months ago a colleague took my advice and picked up a cat from there. When he went back for the cats injections he was astonished at how rude one of the staff was to him. He said if he had been going to select a cat he would have walked out.


I would not like to think the actions of one member of staff might stop people donating, adopting or volunteering.

You can get that kind of treatment from a trip to any vets.

Our annual trip to the one on Lordship Lane was not the usual - the first two in - we were told our monsters were quite considerably underweight (For their breed and size they quite clearly are not), were cross questioned as to their eating, cleaning and playing habits as if we kept them locked up in a cat basket all the time or weren't looking after them. Quite surprisingly we left wondering where the girl got her qualifications from. The 2nd two in were seen by someone completely different and was much more caring (especially to our old girl). The difference was very noticable and obviously when going back (if we do) we shall ensure we wont be seen by that particular vet again.


It's a shame we encounter such things but it happens in many places... :(

I completely agree. The animals should not suffer because of those people....BUT those people represent the trust and they should be doing a better job because they are spokespeople for the trust.


I urge anyone who wants a cat to go them to rehome, to dontae money or food or bedding for those poor cats that are still there stuck in cages for days on end.


But the customers/adopters are the ones keeping that place afloat and should be treated with the respect that is deserved. Not because we are customers but because we are in a civilised country and are trying to help.

i got my cats from celia hammonds and i must say that most of the staff there are really nice, unfortunatly there are a few bad apples that like playing god. The work they do there is second to none and its really nice that they help all the cats that need it most. I have had a few issues in the past with the rudeness of the indian receptionist, but obviously she has a god complex and has no life!i just pity her. You should write a letter and make sure you send it to Celia Hammond DIRECT p

Racism is not acceptable in this day and age. ThaT should have died out with the dinosaurs!

But the customers/adopters are the ones keeping that place afloat and should be treated with the respect that is deserved. Not because we are customers but because we are in a civilised country and are trying to help.


i agree with catloverkathy the customers should be treated with the dignity they deserve after all they wouldnt be there if no-one took cats from them. Maybe they should think about that abit more

  • Administrator
I am putting a stop to this. When someone i.e. catloverkathy has a conversation with themselves as a different user i.e. vivien to slag off a business/organisation, alarm bells ring in Forum Towers. Take your issues to them, do not use the forum to falsely enhance your story.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...