Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There you go comparing deaths again.

>

> Can we, who feel that way, not just say that Cilla

> is a sad loss.



I wasn't comparing anything with anything. And yes, my whole point was that anyone can feel sad about any death.


Just don't over egg the pudding.


And why did Cilla need her own thread?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If FJDGoose had really been on the born he

> could

> > of given Bolan's real name. Mark Feld.

> >

> > Missed a point or two there Goosey. ;-)

> >

> > Foxy

>

> on the born? what does that mean?



dunno - do they sell it at Hope Burns & Black?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If FJDGoose had really been on the born he

> could

> > of given Bolan's real name. Mark Feld.

> >

> > Missed a point or two there Goosey. ;-)

> >

> > Foxy

>

> on the born? what does that mean?



I typed on the ball twice and it changed it to born.


Will probably change it again.


Foxy

I agree minder, it's crossing a line that doesn't need to be crossed. I'm sick of this modern culture of mocking those no longer here to defend themselves. If you didn't like the person stay schtum and don't say anything, at least in the short term whilst people are grieving. Have a bit of bloody dignity. You wouldn't like if it were one of your loved ones being referred.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...