Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?


SteveT, do you have just the one record? And do you realise its broken?

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?



Arbeit Macht Frei

Jeremy wrote:- Put immigrants and asylum seekers into camps! What a wonderful idea! Perhaps we could force them to build roads and railways (at gunpoint) too?

:))


No not at all Jeremy but I believe asylum seekers should work for their daily bread like the rest of us unless they are disabled.

lindylou Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I only posted once on the west dulwich forum,

> which was not at all racist. Good lu ck to you if

> you want to be associated with a rasisc scum bag.

> Have loked u up amnd all u do is agree with TSL.

> So >>>>>


In English, this means?

I think we should ship-in any foreigners who are willing to get off their fat, lazy arses and do some work in order to better their lives - and give them a nice council house to get them started as an incentive.


This would allow us to export homegrown feckless Brits who are unwilling to get off their fat, lazy arses, do some work and make something of themselves instead of sitting around demanding their right to council house (for life) and believing made-up drivel that just popped through the letterbox in a BNP leaflet simply because it suits them.



Im with you Bob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...