Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?


SteveT, do you have just the one record? And do you realise its broken?

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?



Arbeit Macht Frei

Jeremy wrote:- Put immigrants and asylum seekers into camps! What a wonderful idea! Perhaps we could force them to build roads and railways (at gunpoint) too?

:))


No not at all Jeremy but I believe asylum seekers should work for their daily bread like the rest of us unless they are disabled.

lindylou Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I only posted once on the west dulwich forum,

> which was not at all racist. Good lu ck to you if

> you want to be associated with a rasisc scum bag.

> Have loked u up amnd all u do is agree with TSL.

> So >>>>>


In English, this means?

I think we should ship-in any foreigners who are willing to get off their fat, lazy arses and do some work in order to better their lives - and give them a nice council house to get them started as an incentive.


This would allow us to export homegrown feckless Brits who are unwilling to get off their fat, lazy arses, do some work and make something of themselves instead of sitting around demanding their right to council house (for life) and believing made-up drivel that just popped through the letterbox in a BNP leaflet simply because it suits them.



Im with you Bob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...