Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?


SteveT, do you have just the one record? And do you realise its broken?

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why can't the newly arrived homeless be put into

> government camps on MoD land, as they have the

> acreage, and not take up the precious housing

> stock which would remove any possibility of queue

> jumping?



Arbeit Macht Frei

Jeremy wrote:- Put immigrants and asylum seekers into camps! What a wonderful idea! Perhaps we could force them to build roads and railways (at gunpoint) too?

:))


No not at all Jeremy but I believe asylum seekers should work for their daily bread like the rest of us unless they are disabled.

lindylou Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I only posted once on the west dulwich forum,

> which was not at all racist. Good lu ck to you if

> you want to be associated with a rasisc scum bag.

> Have loked u up amnd all u do is agree with TSL.

> So >>>>>


In English, this means?

I think we should ship-in any foreigners who are willing to get off their fat, lazy arses and do some work in order to better their lives - and give them a nice council house to get them started as an incentive.


This would allow us to export homegrown feckless Brits who are unwilling to get off their fat, lazy arses, do some work and make something of themselves instead of sitting around demanding their right to council house (for life) and believing made-up drivel that just popped through the letterbox in a BNP leaflet simply because it suits them.



Im with you Bob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The BBC is one of the finest, if not the finest, broadcasters in the world.  They have been admired by many across the world for their journalism.  There have been numerous arrests since their recent expose on convenience shops that cover ups for criminals - money laundering, contraband,  illegal workers and the like. By no means perfect and some of what they have done in the modern world is questionable - the website often comes across as tabloid or sensationalist, as do some of their documentaries, and at times it is full of low grade game shows, fly on the wall etc which bring the punters and money, including overseas, in but is not quality TV.  In their desperation for 'balance' they've given too much air time and credibility to some more extreme views, which contributed to Brexit and some of the rise in right wing parties.  I wish they'd say 'the convicted criminal' every time they talk about Yaxley Lenon. The programme was clumsy, why it didn't go through proper clearance including the lawyers, I don't know.  But it created zero stir at the time. Zero.  And had no impact on the election, so Trump has no case.  I hope they don't cave in like many of the US corporations and media.  Oh and well done to South Park using the small p*nis defence in ridiculing him. What I expect is as the Beeb is pretty centrist in it;s reporting in riles some of those who thrive on the toxic populism we have seen since Trump mark 1 and Brexit.  How sad.
    • I understand from Pao that they are taking a short break but will be re-opening on Tuesday 25th November and also that there will be a sign in the window tomorrow, by way of confirmation. Meanwhile, greatly  missed! 
    • He is bummed he missed last forum drinks 
    • They get one thing running and another goes down!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...