Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm open to many things though.

Just not ju-ju men in the sky.

Hardly closed minded to look at what's in front of you and say "that stuff's in front of me" !


Anyways, what you two smokin ? (and where can I get some..)


Also are you a clique ? (or a cult...)

Haven't physicists recently proved that our existence is not really 'real'?


I agree with Jeremy re Dawkins. Went to one of his lectures many moons ago & found him unbelievably arrogant. (Edit: Dawkins not Jeremy...whom I've also met and us definitely not arrogant) :)

Richard Dawkins must increasingly be feeling like he is banging his head against a brick wall given the upsurge in religious fervour all over the place. That teacher that was stabbed (in a science class?) was attributing his narrow escape to Jesus and god....bugger the medics that actually fixed him up!
It stands to reason (literally) that religion is on the decline since we are educated and have thousands of years of philosophy and many more of us have learned to think for ourselves....unfortunately the god-botherers are STILL hijacking many areas of our lives. I do thoroughly object to my taxes funding the desemination of so much deceit and lies-not to mention the discrimination against LGBT people- YES, god-botherers they are human beings!

There are plenty of mainstream Christians who don't have those views of LGBT, and denominations which have lesbian/gay pastors.


Let's also not forget that, for better or worse, the institution that fostered that development of philosophy (and art, and science) was the Church for long stretches of history.


I guess my problem with those blanket statements about the Church and the aggressive approach ofsomeone like Dawkins is that there's no nuance, it's predictable. I agree in principle, but I think he's arguing against the past and there's probably a better conversation to be had.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are plenty of mainstream Christians who

> don't have those views of LGBT, and denominations

> which have lesbian/gay pastors.

>

> Let's also not forget that, for better or worse,

> the institution that fostered that development of

> philosophy (and art, and science) was the Church

> for long stretches of history.

>

> I guess my problem with those blanket statements

> about the Church and the aggressive approach

> of someone like Dawkins is that there's no nuance,

> it's predictable. I agree in principle, but I

> think he's arguing against the past and there's

> probably a better conversation to be had.


But I'd hate for what he says to be banned somehow

under modern blasphemy laws.

I meant to say 'dissemination ....' how it came out as 'desemination...' probably unconscious reference to other 'faith' goings-on.

R. Dawkins is not arguing against the past because the religious beliefs of the past are alive and well today. Faith schools are still operating using dogma from the past, much of it fundamentalist, and it is just as bad as it was 30 years ago- if not worse.

All faiths are self-serving. The leaders are just the same as politicians...instead of crosses on ballot papers, read 'bums on pews' or whatever.

It's all just a way of keeping the poor and needy satisfied with the promise of this 'heaven' ffs

I am not religious. I think religion is a man-made invention, just to try and explain the universe in an age when they couldn't and keep others in check. Any good I do is altruistic and not for some reward from a beardy sky fairy !! OMG ;-)

I can believe there was a Jesus, illegitimate son of an engaged couple and it's a good story, Try that one today down at social services !!!!

And the other religions are not much better, creating a universe from a lotus flower in a belly button? The bible and Quoran actually have a lot in common.

I can't explain or prove where the universe came from: big bang, continually evolving multiverse or whatever, but I don't believe it was "designed" by deities either. Thanks.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I was young I was all f*ucked up on drink and

> drugs.

>

> Then I discovered the Lord.

>

> And now I'm all fuc*ked up on the Lord


Isn't that a quote from Cheech and Chong?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...