Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm open to many things though.

Just not ju-ju men in the sky.

Hardly closed minded to look at what's in front of you and say "that stuff's in front of me" !


Anyways, what you two smokin ? (and where can I get some..)


Also are you a clique ? (or a cult...)

Haven't physicists recently proved that our existence is not really 'real'?


I agree with Jeremy re Dawkins. Went to one of his lectures many moons ago & found him unbelievably arrogant. (Edit: Dawkins not Jeremy...whom I've also met and us definitely not arrogant) :)

Richard Dawkins must increasingly be feeling like he is banging his head against a brick wall given the upsurge in religious fervour all over the place. That teacher that was stabbed (in a science class?) was attributing his narrow escape to Jesus and god....bugger the medics that actually fixed him up!
It stands to reason (literally) that religion is on the decline since we are educated and have thousands of years of philosophy and many more of us have learned to think for ourselves....unfortunately the god-botherers are STILL hijacking many areas of our lives. I do thoroughly object to my taxes funding the desemination of so much deceit and lies-not to mention the discrimination against LGBT people- YES, god-botherers they are human beings!

There are plenty of mainstream Christians who don't have those views of LGBT, and denominations which have lesbian/gay pastors.


Let's also not forget that, for better or worse, the institution that fostered that development of philosophy (and art, and science) was the Church for long stretches of history.


I guess my problem with those blanket statements about the Church and the aggressive approach ofsomeone like Dawkins is that there's no nuance, it's predictable. I agree in principle, but I think he's arguing against the past and there's probably a better conversation to be had.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are plenty of mainstream Christians who

> don't have those views of LGBT, and denominations

> which have lesbian/gay pastors.

>

> Let's also not forget that, for better or worse,

> the institution that fostered that development of

> philosophy (and art, and science) was the Church

> for long stretches of history.

>

> I guess my problem with those blanket statements

> about the Church and the aggressive approach

> of someone like Dawkins is that there's no nuance,

> it's predictable. I agree in principle, but I

> think he's arguing against the past and there's

> probably a better conversation to be had.


But I'd hate for what he says to be banned somehow

under modern blasphemy laws.

I meant to say 'dissemination ....' how it came out as 'desemination...' probably unconscious reference to other 'faith' goings-on.

R. Dawkins is not arguing against the past because the religious beliefs of the past are alive and well today. Faith schools are still operating using dogma from the past, much of it fundamentalist, and it is just as bad as it was 30 years ago- if not worse.

All faiths are self-serving. The leaders are just the same as politicians...instead of crosses on ballot papers, read 'bums on pews' or whatever.

It's all just a way of keeping the poor and needy satisfied with the promise of this 'heaven' ffs

I am not religious. I think religion is a man-made invention, just to try and explain the universe in an age when they couldn't and keep others in check. Any good I do is altruistic and not for some reward from a beardy sky fairy !! OMG ;-)

I can believe there was a Jesus, illegitimate son of an engaged couple and it's a good story, Try that one today down at social services !!!!

And the other religions are not much better, creating a universe from a lotus flower in a belly button? The bible and Quoran actually have a lot in common.

I can't explain or prove where the universe came from: big bang, continually evolving multiverse or whatever, but I don't believe it was "designed" by deities either. Thanks.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I was young I was all f*ucked up on drink and

> drugs.

>

> Then I discovered the Lord.

>

> And now I'm all fuc*ked up on the Lord


Isn't that a quote from Cheech and Chong?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...