Jump to content

Recommended Posts

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> daizie, if the other thread is true then I'm

> really sorry that you had a bad experience and I

> hope you're ok.

>

> But surely you can see that, even without the

> startling similarities between you and certain

> previous troublesome posters, your general

> attitude to the forum has always been one of

> contempt and negativity and so it's not wholely

> surprising that people are having their doubts

> about your sincerity now, is it?


OK . But.. always ? + Comments = making up stories ? Cant' see the connection .


Someone has to liven you lot up .


*off to do some sacking* mwahahaha

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was kind of meant figuratively. I don't

> literally turn into a sociopathic septegenarian

> pervert when I have gin.



No, of course you don't, that happens much earlier in the evening!

OK . But.. always ?


Ok, no, I've just looked back through your posts and they're not always nasty and negative, but quite a few of them are especially when you first joined.


And believe it or not I do have a sense of humour, I just don't see how being unpleasant for the sake of it is funny or livens things up.


But in this case it seems you were unfairly accused. Other people have confirmed you story on the thread in the gossip section, so I'm sorry you had a bad experience and I'm sorry you sincerity was doubted.

That must mean im getting better then ;-)


Now I know what some people are going on about. I just did a search and read some of FelicityNormal's posts. What a girl! Even by my standards that is weird! The similarities are uncanny . However, she did say that one of her parents was black, mine is'nt, so I know I could'nt have written it sleep walking / typing .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been thinking about it and what I have loosely come up with so far are sites and types. Sites Here, Comment is Free, the Independent, the BBC (difficult as their comments section is only ever on trivia), The Telegraph (less so but increasing), The times (rapidly increasing), New Statesman, Spectator (much less so but some increase) even the Daily Mail and UnHerd (perhaps even union platforms, agit-prop and "progressive" platforms, XR, "middle-East", Just Stop Oil, Reddit, Bluesky, Truth Social etc.) I am sure the AI will find more to cross-reference. Types Astro-turfers, single-issue obsessives (frequently overlap with Astro-turfers), floral enforcers, ideologues, political staff, hypocrites, luxury belief pushers, Igors and Renfields. The vast majority are; normal local residents a bit frustrated with something; those looking for a tradesman; or just the friendly saying hello and looking for a bit of community.
    • Going by tracking information they go via Croydon and East Dulwich (Peckham) sorting offices. Round my way, and I know it varies from street to street, delivery of tracked items brought by the regular postman is mostly reliable. I've noticed if there isn't a postman doing a regular round, there may be a walking postman just delivering the tracked items. 
    • Are the parcel services organised by the local sorting office? We always notice parcels delivered by the vans are delivered on time but those that come via the postie can be unpredictable and we often get a "you were not in" when no-one even attempted delivery.
    • Yes, this thread has got weird.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...