Jump to content

Recommended Posts

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> daizie, if the other thread is true then I'm

> really sorry that you had a bad experience and I

> hope you're ok.

>

> But surely you can see that, even without the

> startling similarities between you and certain

> previous troublesome posters, your general

> attitude to the forum has always been one of

> contempt and negativity and so it's not wholely

> surprising that people are having their doubts

> about your sincerity now, is it?


OK . But.. always ? + Comments = making up stories ? Cant' see the connection .


Someone has to liven you lot up .


*off to do some sacking* mwahahaha

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was kind of meant figuratively. I don't

> literally turn into a sociopathic septegenarian

> pervert when I have gin.



No, of course you don't, that happens much earlier in the evening!

OK . But.. always ?


Ok, no, I've just looked back through your posts and they're not always nasty and negative, but quite a few of them are especially when you first joined.


And believe it or not I do have a sense of humour, I just don't see how being unpleasant for the sake of it is funny or livens things up.


But in this case it seems you were unfairly accused. Other people have confirmed you story on the thread in the gossip section, so I'm sorry you had a bad experience and I'm sorry you sincerity was doubted.

That must mean im getting better then ;-)


Now I know what some people are going on about. I just did a search and read some of FelicityNormal's posts. What a girl! Even by my standards that is weird! The similarities are uncanny . However, she did say that one of her parents was black, mine is'nt, so I know I could'nt have written it sleep walking / typing .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Perhaps responses are made by DM?
    • Posting for a friend. Missing from The Gardens.   Amazingly found after 2 days just as I posted.  My powers are better than I thought!!!!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...