Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Baggs Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The best thing to do with this kind of

> infestation

> > is to cut the tops off and fill them with a

> > concentrated glyphosate solution (if they are

> > thick enough). Then spray the ones which are

> too

> > small to fill/inject.

>

>

> I think you're on the wrong thread :))

>

> Unless you're suggesting murdering the laptop

> squatters with Roundup :))


Baggs is confused and talking about Japanese Knotweed..


Well I hope so. :)


Foxy

dulwich2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't understand why they don't just use their

> own wifi at home? I've never thought to take

> laptop out to a coffe shop. why? Surely

> everything has Internet at home now days?


You could save save ???? on pints of beer in the pub by simply getting drunk at home, on your own

thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwich2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't understand why they don't just use

> their

> > own wifi at home? I've never thought to take

> > laptop out to a coffe shop. why? Surely

> > everything has Internet at home now days?

>

> You could save save ???? on pints of beer in the

> pub by simply getting drunk at home, on your own


Thought about it often but I don't think you would use the same pub as me.

Everyone has a valid point - but there is little appreciation of that.

There is a difference between laptop squatters - which is not restricted to ED - who use cafes are a place of work, making calls and basically moving in and treating it like a temporary office and people who need a break and a change of scene.


similarly, parents who go out with their kids - who behave like kids (and not mini adults) and parents who completely ignore their kids and allow their behaviour to go unchecked.

We should all be able to tolerate and welcome our neighbours but unsocial behaviour can be annoying.


At the end of the day - is it your cafe? if not, decide if you don't want to go there anymore. you could possibly mention your reasons to the owner....


Otherwise, let's all just get on with our day.


And, while we're on the topic of knotweed - how do i get the railway company to deal with the infestation on their side of the fence?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> And, while we're on the topic of knotweed - how do

> i get the railway company to deal with the

> infestation on their side of the fence?


Make sure you change your wifi password every half an hour, should get rid of most of them, whichever side of the fence.

  • 7 months later...
  • 9 months later...

I like this very polite notice I saw recently:


http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn185/idiotboy77/BD17EE83-8658-4670-996A-80B8E4D2F1AC_zpsxavafjjv.jpg


On the next table, a man wrapped up like an Arctic explorer, working on his laptop. (It was a bit chilly in there.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...