Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just heard on Radio5 that to deal with truancy, Glenfield Infants school in Southampton, is offering parents a free curry voucher in return for their children attending school.


Is this not a school that is rewarding parents for purely meeting their legal obligation. This is surely bad parenting being rewarded by poor logic from poor schools.


Management of children seems to go from bad to worse. When I was at school, our school had big walls round the outside and you had zero chance of either getting out or being allowed out during the school day.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7158-truancy-and-the-curry-club/
Share on other sites

BBW - I found out only recently that kids were allowed out of the school grounds in lunchtime to do pretty much whatever they want - if you let them out halfway through the day its not surprising some of them prefer not to come back. Lock them in from 9am tp 3pm I think.

Mick - I agree entirely. School should be a place where the teachers are in charge and not having to constantly compromise with it's pupils. When I was at school (I left secondary in 2000) it went like this;


"Sir/Miss I need to leave school at lunchtime to go home."


"Do you have a note from your parents or any consent from a member of staff to leave the school grounds?"


"No."


"Then you will remain on the school grounds until it's time to go home."


I know I slag off the Irish a tiny bit but I count myself lucky to have had a strict but fair/decent Irish headmaster who knew when I was up to something. Peter Walsh, Forest hill boys. He's retired but I'll never forget him and I saw him in Forest hill last month and I still called him Sir.

He called me by my first name. He remembers all of his flock past and present and he even asked after my brothers. When he was sworn in as headmaster when I was 13 he openly cried on stage but the school thought nothing less of him and the applause was literally deafening.


He wouldn't run away from me and whenever I bump into him I still feel as though I'm in uniform.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He called me by my first name. He remembers all of

> his flock past and present and he even asked after

> my brothers. When he was sworn in as headmaster

> when I was 13 he openly cried on stage but the

> school thought nothing less of him and the

> applause was literally deafening.

>

> He wouldn't run away from me and whenever I bump

> into him I still feel as though I'm in uniform.


What kind of uniform?


A wolf in Sheep's clothing?

You are getting sentimental again BBW. My school had a headmistess, Sister Sheila, jeez she was a tough one. Not to be messed with.


My Dad was a teacher and in general he had the respect of most pupils - Its interesting when you leave school and bump into an old teacher, it seems they treat you as equal after you leave school, yet you feel the need to look up to them anyway, because you always did when you were at school.


Its good to see you respect your old head BBW. He sounds like an old Mr Chips.

I never played truant (or wagged as we call it in oz) besides the fact that my school would have brought the roof down upon me (strict catholic schooling my whole life) my mother would have made my life a living hell.. Twas far easier just to buck up and head to school every day..


I find it shocking that these kind of schemes even merit any thought..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...