Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Will Magic Pants be popular in ED?


"More than 4,000 women signed up for an email alert that they are back in shops, suggesting the latest batch could also sell out fast.

The fabric of the ?25 pants contains crystals which warm up when they come in contact with the skin.

The heat is said to improve the circulation in the thighs, bottom and stomach, encouraging fat cells to 'melt' into a liquid. This is then excreted from the body by the liver.

Research showed that four out of five women who wore the knickers every day for a month lost inches from their stomach, hips and thighs. Cellulite was also reduced. The effects are said to last up to 12 months, provided wearers exercise and eat healthily."





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1201373/Shoppers-knickers-twist-rush-buy-best-selling-anti-cellulite-control-pants.html#ixzz0M1uAHFN9

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/
Share on other sites

Well a 1 in 6 hit rate would be around 16.7% rather than 3.125%


I can see the 1/2 life argument.


It would be as if, upon a 'no-show', the pants became half as lucky each time as they were the previous time.


In that case you'd only need to wear them five times to deliver a pair of pants that was 3.125% of their initial beaver-magnet quality.


If you assume that they only suffered the collapse in fanny-fetchability when they were discarded after a fruitless episode, then you could indeed have pulled on those pants six times and have them at 3.125% effectiveness.


Mathematically this could be written as 1/(2?(n-1)) where n is the number of times you've pulled them on.


This state of play would only exist until you took them off.


At that point, dependent on the context, they would either suffer another catastrophic fall in their pussy-pulling rating, or a dramatic climb.


Much like Schroedinger's cat, engaging with the pants causes them to collapse into one state or another. Until that moment, these are neither lucky or unlucky pants, they're merely cotton briefs.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/#findComment-228466
Share on other sites

Apart from the vanity issue do these magic scrundies cater for 'accidents'?


Unfortunately I tend to mix spicy food with Lager in the evenings and this disastrous combination can play havoc with my morning routine. Like all red blooded males I thoroughly enjoy farting but after a night of wifebeater and Simosa'a I often find myself 'playing soldier' as in I'll be going about my business such as walking to the shops and upon letting out a boistrous trouser cough I'll freeze on the spot due to thinking I've soiled my self 'mid sneeze'.


Would these wonder garments hide all if any evidence of an 'accident'



P.s I'm mainly asking on behalf of Mike P as he 'plays soldiers' far more than I do. So much so that some days he's been known to spend all day on the landing between his bedroom and toilet in fear of dropping the kids off before he gets to the pool, if you know what I mean.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/#findComment-228615
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...