Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Will Magic Pants be popular in ED?


"More than 4,000 women signed up for an email alert that they are back in shops, suggesting the latest batch could also sell out fast.

The fabric of the ?25 pants contains crystals which warm up when they come in contact with the skin.

The heat is said to improve the circulation in the thighs, bottom and stomach, encouraging fat cells to 'melt' into a liquid. This is then excreted from the body by the liver.

Research showed that four out of five women who wore the knickers every day for a month lost inches from their stomach, hips and thighs. Cellulite was also reduced. The effects are said to last up to 12 months, provided wearers exercise and eat healthily."





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1201373/Shoppers-knickers-twist-rush-buy-best-selling-anti-cellulite-control-pants.html#ixzz0M1uAHFN9

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/
Share on other sites

Well a 1 in 6 hit rate would be around 16.7% rather than 3.125%


I can see the 1/2 life argument.


It would be as if, upon a 'no-show', the pants became half as lucky each time as they were the previous time.


In that case you'd only need to wear them five times to deliver a pair of pants that was 3.125% of their initial beaver-magnet quality.


If you assume that they only suffered the collapse in fanny-fetchability when they were discarded after a fruitless episode, then you could indeed have pulled on those pants six times and have them at 3.125% effectiveness.


Mathematically this could be written as 1/(2?(n-1)) where n is the number of times you've pulled them on.


This state of play would only exist until you took them off.


At that point, dependent on the context, they would either suffer another catastrophic fall in their pussy-pulling rating, or a dramatic climb.


Much like Schroedinger's cat, engaging with the pants causes them to collapse into one state or another. Until that moment, these are neither lucky or unlucky pants, they're merely cotton briefs.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/#findComment-228466
Share on other sites

Apart from the vanity issue do these magic scrundies cater for 'accidents'?


Unfortunately I tend to mix spicy food with Lager in the evenings and this disastrous combination can play havoc with my morning routine. Like all red blooded males I thoroughly enjoy farting but after a night of wifebeater and Simosa'a I often find myself 'playing soldier' as in I'll be going about my business such as walking to the shops and upon letting out a boistrous trouser cough I'll freeze on the spot due to thinking I've soiled my self 'mid sneeze'.


Would these wonder garments hide all if any evidence of an 'accident'



P.s I'm mainly asking on behalf of Mike P as he 'plays soldiers' far more than I do. So much so that some days he's been known to spend all day on the landing between his bedroom and toilet in fear of dropping the kids off before he gets to the pool, if you know what I mean.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7159-magic-pants/#findComment-228615
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...