Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was surprised they were so different. What do the Top 10s say about their services and users?


Soundcloud?s 10 most played artists of the year


1. Drake

2. Major Lazer

3. G-Eazy

4. Future

5. Kygo

6. PARTYNEXTDOOR

7. Chris Brown

8. Kid Ink

9. The Weeknd

10. Chance The Rapper


Spotify?s most-streamed artists


1. Calvin Harris

2. Chris Brown

3. Drake

4. Ed Sheeran

5. Pitbull

6. Sam Smith

7. David Guetta

8. Wiz Khalifa

9. Nicki Minaj

10. Ellie Goulding


YouTube?s most popular official pages


1. Maroon 5

2. Katy Perry

3. Rihanna

4. Nicky Jam

5. Ariana Grande

6. Ed Sheeran

7. Enrique Iglesias

8. Beyonc?

9. David Guetta

10. Meghan Trainor


Read more at http://m.inthemix.com.au/news/61129/Soundcloud_names_its_10_most_played_artists_of_2015#mBlIoqZ55Ulam4Sf.99

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/72091-music-services-top-10/
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering what that said about Soundcloud

> and its direction/user group as compared to Spotify for example



Otta Wrote: probably because soundcloud has a lot of independent artists.


This. Soundcloud is conventionally a service for those at the "grassroots" level of music, whereas Spotify is more geared towards the relatively mainstream.

http://www.factmag.com/2015/08/27/prs-for-music-takes-legal-action-against-soundcloud/



I don't really understand their point. Surely artists decide to put their music on soundcloud or not, and choose whether or not it's for public consumption, and whether or not people can download it.


So what are PRS suggesting that Soundcloud should be doing differently?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These people are only "huge" if you listen to

> certain radio stations, certain TV channels/shows,

> etc. To the rest of us they barely exist.


Was directed at the 'soundcloud is for grass roots artists' comment.


Huge in terms of record sales.


Not my cup of tea, but clearly plenty of people's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...