Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was surprised they were so different. What do the Top 10s say about their services and users?


Soundcloud?s 10 most played artists of the year


1. Drake

2. Major Lazer

3. G-Eazy

4. Future

5. Kygo

6. PARTYNEXTDOOR

7. Chris Brown

8. Kid Ink

9. The Weeknd

10. Chance The Rapper


Spotify?s most-streamed artists


1. Calvin Harris

2. Chris Brown

3. Drake

4. Ed Sheeran

5. Pitbull

6. Sam Smith

7. David Guetta

8. Wiz Khalifa

9. Nicki Minaj

10. Ellie Goulding


YouTube?s most popular official pages


1. Maroon 5

2. Katy Perry

3. Rihanna

4. Nicky Jam

5. Ariana Grande

6. Ed Sheeran

7. Enrique Iglesias

8. Beyonc?

9. David Guetta

10. Meghan Trainor


Read more at http://m.inthemix.com.au/news/61129/Soundcloud_names_its_10_most_played_artists_of_2015#mBlIoqZ55Ulam4Sf.99

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/72091-music-services-top-10/
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering what that said about Soundcloud

> and its direction/user group as compared to Spotify for example



Otta Wrote: probably because soundcloud has a lot of independent artists.


This. Soundcloud is conventionally a service for those at the "grassroots" level of music, whereas Spotify is more geared towards the relatively mainstream.

http://www.factmag.com/2015/08/27/prs-for-music-takes-legal-action-against-soundcloud/



I don't really understand their point. Surely artists decide to put their music on soundcloud or not, and choose whether or not it's for public consumption, and whether or not people can download it.


So what are PRS suggesting that Soundcloud should be doing differently?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These people are only "huge" if you listen to

> certain radio stations, certain TV channels/shows,

> etc. To the rest of us they barely exist.


Was directed at the 'soundcloud is for grass roots artists' comment.


Huge in terms of record sales.


Not my cup of tea, but clearly plenty of people's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was that the Hare Krishna place? I can't remember exactly where it was (or maybe still is) but it was somewhere around Oxford Street.
    • The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. And the "wanted" section let's people ask for things they want or need, for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and also local  food banks. And there is (or was) a local scheme where you can bring things to be repaired free. I think it is/was based in Nunhead. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. 
    • I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
    • Agreed. Just stating as a historic fact they tried to stiffle reviews.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...