Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I am a new dog walker, I walk 4-5 dogs a day for a couple hours round Peckham Park. The company i work for has trained me with the dogs, and to make sure I pick up all there fouling, and make sure they are behaved.

As I know the dogs well and how they are with others I can let all of them off the leed and they will all stay in distance and never run away. I always keep an eye out along with every other dog walker to get ALL fouling and we work hard to do that. Even as a new be I don't like hearing that people have problems with us walking round the dogs, it's a lovely business that gives the chance for owners who don't have enough time to walk their dogs to be done well. We all work hard and care so much for the dogs, we are all friendly so please do come up to us if you see a problem!

Thanks

I really wish people would stop writing inflammatory posts about dogs and their owners / walkers. Most (most) owners and walkers are responsible and pick up after their dog(s) and are able to keep them under control. When dogs are in a group, they enjoy playing together - not "fighting" or causing "chaos". I don't think I've ever seen someone's dogs literally fighting each other - that would be distressing, and perhaps needs to be reported. I agree that 30 dogs between 3 people is excessive, but again it sounds like exaggeration.


As long as people have dogs - and presumably have to go out to work to be able to afford them - they are going to need to employ a dog-walker. Without them the dogs would be left alone for hours upon hours every day which is not an option. Many dog walkers in ED have been doing it for a number of years, and also some will have a background in dog behaviour and training. Also, As far as I am aware, there is only one Dog Control Order in place (4 per handler) at One Tree Hill due to irresponsible dog walkers.


All us ED'ers have equal responsibility when using our local parks and it is in all of our interests to do so, so let's just try to live and let live a bit more, and maybe try to modify such emotive language about people who are effectively in the park 365 days of the year, rain or shine.

Harriet2015 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am a new dog walker, I walk 4-5 dogs a day for a

> couple hours round Peckham Park. The company i

> work for has trained me with the dogs, and to make

> sure I pick up all there fouling, and make sure

> they are behaved.

> As I know the dogs well and how they are with

> others I can let all of them off the leed and they

> will all stay in distance and never run away. I

> always keep an eye out along with every other dog

> walker to get ALL fouling and we work hard to do

> that. Even as a new be I don't like hearing that

> people have problems with us walking round the

> dogs, it's a lovely business that gives the chance

> for owners who don't have enough time to walk

> their dogs to be done well. We all work hard and

> care so much for the dogs, we are all friendly so

> please do come up to us if you see a problem!

> Thanks


Which company do you work for.

I certainly agree with the "live and let live" approach and also think that inflammatory statements are probably not necessary. I also believe that dogs will be dogs, and that's fine by me!


My gripe should probably be in a new thread as I don't think it necessarily relates to professional dog walkers.


Question: Why do some dog owners think it's perfectly fine for their dog to run over to me when I'm sat in the park, jump on me, steal my picnic (on countless occasions), run around my blanket, sniff or even lick my baby or small child, put their nose in my face etc?


Do they get up from their own blanket, run over to retrieve their dog, put it back on a lead or apologise? No!


This is not an exaggeration or inflammatory, I can guarantee something like this will happen every time I go to Peckham Rye. This summer I often ended up moving on because I didn't like a dog taking me by surprise with a wet nose in my face (or mouth.....bleuuuurgh!)when I'm lying down relaxing.


I have dogs and so I'm not simply complaining because I'm a dog hater.


Owners have a responsibility to train their dogs. If they can't be trained to come back when called then they need to be kept by their side.

  • 8 months later...

I know this is an old link - but find Jane's comment particularly frustrating. I have refrained from posting anything negative about Jane1 and her business, but I have to say that she is being hugely hypocritical when she says, "I would love to find the owner of the dogs they walk, to let the know what is happening to there dogs when they go on there daily walks" - at least these dogs are going for their walks!!


Jane1 lied outright to us about walking our dog, Freya, when she were spotted by a friend coming to our flat, and leaving (in a waiting taxi) without Freya - all in the space of 5 minutes, and then when confronted, claimed she had actually taken Freya for her walk. Maybe this was a one off, maybe she doesn't 'walk' dogs anymore - but all I will say is people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

I saw two women one morning last week, gabbing away to each other while ignoring the three dogs they had between them, two Border terriers and a Cavalier. They were in front of the dogs at most times, and I saw them miss at least one pile of poo, from the Cavalier. If two women can't or won't monitor three dogs, then what hope is there for larger amounts of dogs?


The park seems like a weird sort of dog racetrack now.

Take Note Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I really wish people would stop writing

> inflammatory posts about dogs and their owners /

> walkers. Most (most) owners and walkers are

> responsible and pick up after their dog(s) and are

> able to keep them under control. When dogs are in

> a group, they enjoy playing together - not

> "fighting" or causing "chaos". I don't think I've

> ever seen someone's dogs literally fighting each

> other - that would be distressing, and perhaps

> needs to be reported. I agree that 30 dogs between

> 3 people is excessive, but again it sounds like

> exaggeration.

>

> As long as people have dogs - and presumably have

> to go out to work to be able to afford them - they

> are going to need to employ a dog-walker. Without

> them the dogs would be left alone for hours upon

> hours every day which is not an option. Many dog

> walkers in ED have been doing it for a number of

> years, and also some will have a background in dog

> behaviour and training. Also, As far as I am

> aware, there is only one Dog Control Order in

> place (4 per handler) at One Tree Hill due to

> irresponsible dog walkers.

>

> All us ED'ers have equal responsibility when using

> our local parks and it is in all of our interests

> to do so, so let's just try to live and let live a

> bit more, and maybe try to modify such emotive

> language about people who are effectively in the

> park 365 days of the year, rain or shine.


Why do people get a dog if they have to go out to work? It's not fair to the dog to be left alone for hours, especially a young dog. Having a dog walker isn't enough.

Why do people have children if they have to go out to work? What a ridiculous statement Rosetta. I am up at 6:30 for a 40 minute walk and we have a dog walker for lunch time then another walk at 4:30. Unfortunately, the dog walker we trusted was lying to us (see previous comment). We now have other arrangements, which are working well. We work hard to ensure our dog is a happy, loved dog, as do most dog owners.

cattyd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why do people have children if they have to go out

> to work? What a ridiculous statement Rosetta. I am

> up at 6:30 for a 40 minute walk and we have a dog

> walker for lunch time then another walk at 4:30.

> Unfortunately, the dog walker we trusted was lying

> to us (see previous comment). We now have other

> arrangements, which are working well. We work hard

> to ensure our dog is a happy, loved dog, as do

> most dog owners.


I wasn't actually aiming my question at you,because I didn't know you went out to work, but if you got a dog knowing you had to get a dog walker to take it out, then why? Some people work from home and are with their dog most of the time, but could use a dog walker to take their dog out occasionally. But don't understand how someone could get a puppy and then go out to work every day and expect a dog walker to train and socialise a dog.


Equating children to dogs is rather strange. I don't know anyone who would leave young children alone before the age of 11 or thereabouts.

cattyd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why do people have children if they have to go out

> to work? What a ridiculous statement


Maternity / paternity leave? The availability of (and indeed requirement for) schooling?


> I am

> up at 6:30 for a 40 minute walk and we have a dog

> walker for lunch time then another walk at 4:30.

> Unfortunately, the dog walker we trusted was lying

> to us (see previous comment). We now have other

> arrangements, which are working well. We work hard

> to ensure our dog is a happy, loved dog, as do

> most dog owners.


It's actually a real concern. There have been surveys showing that around a quarter of owners admit leaving their dogs alone for much of the day - that's just the ones who admit it. Dogs are social animals and have been further bred to enhance certain sociable traits. Leaving them alone for more than a couple of hours is cruel. If we're being really honest a dog walker is no substitute either in the case of a very owner focussed dog.

  • 1 month later...
I have notice around the whole park there is signs that dogs should be kept on leads but they don't seem to listen it can be a annoying when you have a little child and the dogs are running everywhere and I have to pick her up because the dogs are playing of the leads
I love all animals, however I thought by law you are only allowed to walk four at a time. I have no issues as long as they do pick up poo, which I'm sure most do, however my only concern is, if one of the dogs got in to a fight or was attacked by an idiot with perhaps one dog off lead, I should imagine it would be quite hard to manage, especially if all dogs of lead. My personal opinion is if I couldn't walk my own dog, I wouldn't have one and the way things are going with dogs getting stolen, I wouldn't let anyone take my dog out, unless I was sick, then I'd only trust my brother! That is just me though, live and let live!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...