Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Following the recent media earthquake concerning politicians fiddling with tax payers money for their own benefit I thought it would be interesting, not to mention relevent, to ask you lot if you've ever claimed for stuff you shouldn't have. I personally haven't ever really had an expenses account but I have hired out machinerey and tools that I don't own to builders and friends over the weekend without the owners consent. I've made a tidy sum carrying out this blatant abuse of my position.


Over to you.



(Moved to the Lounge as it is not a current affair or topic relevant for the Drawing Room - The Administrator)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/
Share on other sites

VeI've had a couple of nice meals and the odd drinkypoo on expenses but I don't think I've ever abused expenses. I think the company I worked for was insane to fly me out to an office in another country on premium price tickets every week when there were locals perfectly capable of doing the job but that was somebody elses problem.


Plus the taxpayer wasn't paying as that was before that Dutch bank got nationalised by the err...UK government;)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/#findComment-231332
Share on other sites

I suspect it generally comes down to how easy it is to claim. A (tabloid) journalist friend is effectively given a certain sum per week and just has to collect enough receipts to cover it; it's treated as part of the pay packet, and none is ever given back. In my current job the process is pretty tortuous so often I don't bother claiming for genuine expenses.


What you've been doing is a bit different tho' - and very enterprising (and highly illegal). The construction industry is notorious for fiddles, from top to bottom. I heard of a case where a quarry manager got caught flogging truck loads of gravel for cash in the dead of night, which anecdotally goes on all the time. I mean, how do you do a stocktake in a quarry?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/#findComment-231336
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything.
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...